Undergrad Wave function collapse in the early Universe

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of wave function collapse in the early universe, questioning what caused this collapse into particles in the absence of observers or existing particles. Participants emphasize the necessity of specifying a particular interpretation of wave function collapse to address the question meaningfully. The debate highlights that interpretations vary significantly, with some considering collapse as "real" and others not. The lack of clarity in the original question leads to frustration, resulting in the thread being closed for further discussion. The complexity of quantum mechanics and its interpretations remains a significant barrier to resolving these foundational questions.
Bouncer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
What collapsed the wave function when the universe was just beginning
If the wave function collapse is real then what in the very early universe caused the wave functions to collapse into particles since there were no observers? There were not even particles, just a impossibly hot 'soup' of nothing. So what created them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bouncer said:
If the wave function collapse is real then what in the very early universe caused the wave functions to collapse into particles since there were no observers? There were not even particles, just a impossibly hot 'soup' of nothing. So what created them?
This question is unanswerable as you ask it because you have not specified what particular "collapse is real" interpretation you are using. You need to pick one.
 
Bouncer said:
I am not sure it matters which interpretation is used.
It most certainly does, since "collapse" is not "real" on many interpretations, and there are more than one for which it is "real", and in order to answer questions we have to have a specific interpretation to use.

The rest of your wall of text is unreadable, and since you do not appear to have a well posed question, this thread is now closed.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and Jobean123

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 137 ·
5
Replies
137
Views
24K