I Wave function collapse in the early Universe

Bouncer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
What collapsed the wave function when the universe was just beginning
If the wave function collapse is real then what in the very early universe caused the wave functions to collapse into particles since there were no observers? There were not even particles, just a impossibly hot 'soup' of nothing. So what created them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bouncer said:
If the wave function collapse is real then what in the very early universe caused the wave functions to collapse into particles since there were no observers? There were not even particles, just a impossibly hot 'soup' of nothing. So what created them?
This question is unanswerable as you ask it because you have not specified what particular "collapse is real" interpretation you are using. You need to pick one.
 
Bouncer said:
I am not sure it matters which interpretation is used.
It most certainly does, since "collapse" is not "real" on many interpretations, and there are more than one for which it is "real", and in order to answer questions we have to have a specific interpretation to use.

The rest of your wall of text is unreadable, and since you do not appear to have a well posed question, this thread is now closed.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and Jobean123

Thread 'Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons'

I would like to know the validity of the following criticism of one of Zeilinger's latest papers https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.07756 "violation of bell inequality with unentangled photons" The review is by Francis Villatoro, in Spanish, https://francis.naukas.com/2025/07/26/sin-entrelazamiento-no-se-pueden-incumplir-las-desigualdades-de-bell/ I will translate and summarize the criticism as follows: -It is true that a Bell inequality is violated, but not a CHSH inequality. The...
View full post »

Thread 'Question about discussions around quantum interpretations'

I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
View full post »

Thread 'Modern View of Quantum Phenomena'

This is not, strictly speaking, a discussion of interpretations per se. We often see discussions based on QM as it was understood during the early days and the famous Einstein-Bohr debates. The problem with this is that things in QM have advanced tremendously since then, and the 'weirdness' that puzzles those attempting to understand QM has changed. I recently came across a synopsis of these advances, allowing those interested in interpretational issues to understand the modern view...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Collapse of particle wave function and single Universe wave function?
Replies
43
Views
5K
I Layperson's Question -- The wave function requires observation to collapse?
Replies
4
Views
931
I Wave function collapse
Replies
11
Views
2K
Why is the "conscious observer" thing considered?
Replies
10
Views
3K
I Does Conscious Observation Influence Wave Function Collapse?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I What is the mathematical expression of the process of the wave functions collapsing?
Replies
7
Views
2K
I The TSVF interpretation of quantum mechanics
Replies
5
Views
1K
I How Does Local Measurement Affect an Entangled System?
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
I Measurement as a unitary process
Replies
6
Views
1K
Is the concept of "wave function collapse" obsolete?
3
Replies
137
Views
24K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top