Wave function of a free particle

Feynmanfan
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
A short question:

I've learned that the wave function corresponding to a free particle has this form:

Psi(x,0)=1/sqrt(2*Pi)*Integral[g(k)*E^(ikx)dx] (i can't write it in Latex, sorry)

Is it just for the free particle, or any quantum state of a system can be represented in this form, where g(k) is the Fourier transf. of Psi?

Can any function of x, represent the state of the free particle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a wave packet.It's an element of the \tilde{M} which is the space of the continuous linear functionals on the nuclear subspace M.

That is g(k)\in \tilde{M} and \Psi (x,0)\in\tilde{M}.

The free particle's (nonrelativistic) hamiltonian is a densly defined essentially self-adjoint linear operator with a completely continuous spectrum.It is unbounded,therefore the correct mathematical description of the system (free particle)is achived through the construct of rigged Hilbert space.The dual space of the nuclear subspace can be realized as a Hilbert space itself,by defining the scalar product of functionals and "moving" the Hamiltonian from M to \tilde{M}.

As for quantum states,they are built from the fundamental theorems of Wigner & Bargmann.The quantum states are elements of the Rigged Hilbert space of the unitary/antiunitary ray/projective representations of the symmetry groups of the Hamiltonian.

Daniel.
 
Last edited:


The wave function for a free particle can be represented in this form, where g(k) is the Fourier transform of Psi. However, this form is not limited to just the free particle and can be used to represent the quantum state of any system. Additionally, not every function of x can represent the state of a free particle, as the wave function must obey certain conditions such as being normalized and continuous.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K