Wave particle duailty, boundry between classic and the quantum world

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter soulmartyr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Quantum Wave
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on wave-particle duality and the boundary between classical and quantum mechanics. Thomas Young's double slit experiment and Claus Jonsson's electron experiments demonstrate that matter exhibits both particle and wave characteristics, with observation affecting its behavior. Recent experiments by Andrew Cleland with a macroscopic mechanical resonator suggest a potential link between classical and quantum realms. The consensus is that there is no clear boundary; everything is fundamentally quantum, with decoherence making the classical world appear distinct.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave-particle duality
  • Familiarity with the double slit experiment
  • Knowledge of quantum mechanics principles
  • Basic concepts of decoherence in quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Quantum Field Theory and its implications
  • Explore the concept of decoherence in detail
  • Investigate the implications of Andrew Cleland's experiments on macroscopic quantum phenomena
  • Read about the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of wave-particle duality and the relationship between classical and quantum physics.

soulmartyr
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
At what point does matter stop having the ability to function as both a particle and a wave?
In the early 1800s Thomas young created a double slit experiment, where light passed threw two slits and created an interference pattern. This meant light was both a particle and a wave. In 1961 Claus Jonsson repeated the experiment with electrons. First he shot electrons threw one slit getting a pattern of .. one slit. Then he shot them threw two slits expecting to get two slits but instead he got an interference pattern. This means matter itself has the ability to act as both a particle and a wave. He wondered how this was possible and set up an electron detector to see how this was happening and repeated the experiment. This time he got two slits. Matter acted as a particle again just by being observed.
Later this experiment was repeated with the same results with bucky balls made of 60 carbon atoms and then even later completed with a 240 atom object.
Most recent and the most interesting Andrew Cleland of the university of California witnessed a mechanical resonator on a macroscopic scale (big enough to be seen with the naked eye) in a state of superposition. Could this thin disc made of aluminium nitrate, consisting of around a trillion atoms, be a link between our classical and the quantum world of the weird?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
These experiments are wonderful. But they probably do not address the foundations of quantum mechanics, since these experiments just seem to confirm quantum mechanics at larger and larger scales. We already have reason to believe that quantum mechanics applies at the very largest scales http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_04.htm.

But if they do detect a failure of quantum mechanics, then that would affect quantum foundations. Here is one proposal to test a theory that predicts deviations from quantum mechanics:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2868
Optomechanical sensing of spontaneous wave-function collapse
Stefan Nimmrichter, Klaus Hornberger, Klemens Hammerer
 
soulmartyr said:
At what point does matter stop having the ability to function as both a particle and a wave?

Well that's not the correct way of looking at it.

Really its not a particle or a wave or a particle and a wave - its quantum stuff.

See the FAQ:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=511178

While the above is about photons its thrust is true for all particles. Indeed in Quantum Field Theory, which is our most advanced quantum formalism, to which QM is just an approximation, everything is a quantum field and that can't be viewed in such simplistic terms as a particle or a wave.

But to get to the thrust of your query there is no boundary between the classical and the quantum world - everything is quantum. But due to the phenomena of decoherence our everyday world appears classical. This is the modern resolution to the issue with the Copenhagen interpretation that divides the world into classical and quantum:
http://motls.blogspot.com.au/2011/05/copenhagen-interpretation-of-quantum.html

You will find a detailed discussion in Omnes book:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691004358/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K