cosmanino2050
- 5
- 0
- TL;DR
- What are the implications that the wavefunction is not Lorentz invariant?
What are the implications that the wavefunction is not Lorentz invariant?
The wavefunction is not Lorentz invariant, indicating that the framework primarily applies to non-relativistic quantum mechanics. This non-invariance is acceptable for undergraduate studies, as it remains a valid approximation when dealing with energies where relativistic effects are minimal. The discussion emphasizes the practical utility of non-relativistic quantum mechanics in educational contexts.
PREREQUISITESStudents of physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, educators teaching undergraduate courses, and researchers interested in the foundations of quantum theory.
Mostly it means that we’re doing non-relativistic quantum mechanics, the only kind we’re likely to encounter in undergraduate classes. This is an approximation that is valid, accurate, and very useful as long as we’re dealing with energies small enough that relativistic effects are negligible.cosmanino2050 said:TL;DR Summary: What are the implications that the wavefunction is not Lorentz invariant?
What are the implications that the wavefunction is not Lorentz invariant?