Waves or particles or waves of particles?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter W3pcq
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles Waves
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of light, questioning whether it behaves as waves or particles. Participants argue that light cannot be accurately compared to mechanical analogies, emphasizing that both wave and particle models are subjective interpretations. The conversation highlights the complexity of understanding light and gravitational effects, suggesting that the distinction between propagating waves and projected particles could lead to a paradigm shift in our understanding of the universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave-particle duality in quantum physics
  • Familiarity with basic concepts of light and electromagnetic radiation
  • Knowledge of gravitational theories and their implications
  • Awareness of philosophical implications in scientific models
NEXT STEPS
  • Research quantum mechanics and wave-particle duality
  • Explore the implications of gravitational waves in modern physics
  • Study the philosophical perspectives on scientific models and reality
  • Investigate the role of light in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, philosophers of science, and anyone interested in the fundamental nature of light and gravity.

W3pcq
Messages
109
Reaction score
0
What I'm trying to understand is, are light waves like waves on a string, you know where the waves travell along the string, but the string, the source of the wave, ends up in the same place. Or does a photon actually move along the farward path and keep going. Are we being bombarded with particles, are vibrations along "strings" reaching us and interfering? Or?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are many opinions on this, and to me I believe that either view is an incorrect view.

To me, the nature of light, the physics of light cannot be compared to any mechanical analogy that we know of. It's like describing the color gold or red to someone who is blind. We switch between the models (wave vs. particle) when we know that one model more accurately describes light in the given circumstances. You can choose to view it either way, but I think the understanding that "in reality" it is neither and "wave" or "particle" is only a subjective human model of light.

Do you consider gravitational effects the doing of a field (with vibrating waves) or particles (little gravity things hitting you)?
 
I don't know it just seems that the diference between a propigating wave and a projected partice is huge, and the consequinces of one or the other mean complete paradigm shift of how the universe is constructed and operates. I like your answer. I don't think light is like any form of motion familiar to us on earth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K