Weinberg quick question on chapter 2 zero mass

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Heffernana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Weinberg Zero
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the little group structure for zero mass in Weinberg's Quantum Field Theory, specifically on page 69. It clarifies that the transformation W, which is a member of the Lorentz group, leaves the vector k^{\mu}=(0,0,1,1) invariant. The invariance of the time-like vector t^{\mu}=(0,0,0,1) under the transformation W is deduced from the properties of Lorentz transformations, specifically that W^T\eta W=\eta, leading to the conclusion that (Wt)^{\mu}(Wt)_{\mu}=t^{\mu}t_{\mu}=-1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations
  • Familiarity with four-vector notation
  • Knowledge of the Minkowski metric (η)
  • Basic concepts of Quantum Field Theory as presented in Weinberg's texts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Lorentz group and its subgroups
  • Explore the implications of invariance in Quantum Field Theory
  • Review the derivation of the little group for massless particles
  • Examine the role of four-vectors in relativistic physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and anyone studying Quantum Field Theory, particularly those focusing on the properties of massless particles and Lorentz transformations.

Heffernana
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In Weinberg QFT vol 1, page 69, when deriving the little group structure for the case of zero mass can anyone explain the following:

The transformation W by definition leaves k^{\mu}=(0,0,1,1) invariant, i.e. W^{\mu}_{\nu}k^{\nu} = k^{\mu}. Why can you immediately deduce from this that for a time-like vector t^{\mu}=(0,0,0,1) whose length (noting Weinberg's bizarre placing of the time component at the end of the 4-vector) is t^2=-1 is invariant under the previous W transformation, i.e. that:

(Wt)^{\mu}(Wt)_{\mu}=t^{\mu}t_{\mu}=-1

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
W is defined to be a member of a certain subgroup of the Lorentz group, so it's a Lorentz transformation. By definition, a Lorentz transformation W satisfies W^T\eta W=\eta, and this implies (Wt)^2=(Wt)^T\eta(Wt) =t^TW^T\eta Wt=t^T\eta t=t^2=-1. You don't have to use the assumption about the components of t for anything other than the final "=-1".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K