Question about one-particle states

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hgandh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    States
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 1K views
hgandh
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
From Weinberg's Quantum Theory of Fields vol 1. In Chapter 2.5, he lists the transformation rule of a one-particle state under a homogeneous Lorentz transformation:
\begin{equation}
U(\Lambda)\Psi_{p,\sigma} = \sum_{\sigma'}C_{\sigma'\sigma}(\Lambda,p)\Psi_{{\Lambda}p,\sigma'}
\end{equation}
Where sigma are discrete degrees of freedom (not yet shown to be spin). He then goes on to define a standard 4-momentum such that:
\begin{equation}
p^\mu = L^\mu_{v}(p)k^v
\end{equation}
Now he defines one-particle states of momentum p:

\begin{equation}
\Psi_{p,\sigma} {\equiv} N(p)U(L(p))\Psi_{k,\sigma}
\end{equation}

With N a constant.
Now, my question is why does this transformation not affect the sigma variable? According to the first equation, the result of the transformation should be a linear combination of the state vectors. Is it simply assumed that the Lorentz transformation which acts on the standard 4-momentum does not change the other degrees of freedom? Or is there another reason?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my understanding, the right hand side of your eq. (3) is the *definition* of the particle state with momentum p and spin projection σ. So, there is no need for a linear combination. One can choose different unitary mappings from the k-subspace to p-subspaces. They will correspond to different momentum-spin bases in the full Hilbert space and different definitions of the spin operator.

Eugene.