Question about one-particle states

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hgandh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    States
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transformation of one-particle states under homogeneous Lorentz transformations as outlined in Weinberg's "Quantum Theory of Fields" vol 1, specifically in Chapter 2.5. The transformation rule is defined by the equation U(Λ)Ψp,σ = ∑σ'Cσ'σ(Λ,p)ΨΛp,σ', where σ represents discrete degrees of freedom. The transformation does not affect the σ variable because the right-hand side of the equation defines the particle state with momentum p and spin projection σ, eliminating the need for a linear combination. Different unitary mappings correspond to various momentum-spin bases in the Hilbert space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with one-particle states and their definitions
  • Knowledge of unitary mappings in Hilbert space
  • Basic concepts of momentum and spin in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lorentz transformations on quantum states
  • Explore unitary mappings and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between momentum and spin in quantum field theory
  • Review Weinberg's "Quantum Theory of Fields" for deeper insights into particle states
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum field theorists, and advanced students in theoretical physics seeking to deepen their understanding of one-particle states and Lorentz transformations.

hgandh
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
From Weinberg's Quantum Theory of Fields vol 1. In Chapter 2.5, he lists the transformation rule of a one-particle state under a homogeneous Lorentz transformation:
\begin{equation}
U(\Lambda)\Psi_{p,\sigma} = \sum_{\sigma'}C_{\sigma'\sigma}(\Lambda,p)\Psi_{{\Lambda}p,\sigma'}
\end{equation}
Where sigma are discrete degrees of freedom (not yet shown to be spin). He then goes on to define a standard 4-momentum such that:
\begin{equation}
p^\mu = L^\mu_{v}(p)k^v
\end{equation}
Now he defines one-particle states of momentum p:

\begin{equation}
\Psi_{p,\sigma} {\equiv} N(p)U(L(p))\Psi_{k,\sigma}
\end{equation}

With N a constant.
Now, my question is why does this transformation not affect the sigma variable? According to the first equation, the result of the transformation should be a linear combination of the state vectors. Is it simply assumed that the Lorentz transformation which acts on the standard 4-momentum does not change the other degrees of freedom? Or is there another reason?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my understanding, the right hand side of your eq. (3) is the *definition* of the particle state with momentum p and spin projection σ. So, there is no need for a linear combination. One can choose different unitary mappings from the k-subspace to p-subspaces. They will correspond to different momentum-spin bases in the full Hilbert space and different definitions of the spin operator.

Eugene.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K