Weinberg's The First Three Minutes

  • Context: Cosmology 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gmax137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bigbang Cosmology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Weinberg's "The First Three Minutes," particularly the 1988 "Updated Edition" from Basic Books, remains a significant work in cosmology, despite advancements in the field. Readers question the validity of its content in light of newer interpretations, especially regarding Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) data introduced in revision 6. The book is praised for its engaging narrative, although it includes extensive footnotes and endnotes that may challenge some readers. Overall, it continues to be a valuable resource for understanding early universe concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic cosmology concepts
  • Familiarity with Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR)
  • Knowledge of the evolution of astrophysical theories
  • Ability to interpret scientific literature and footnotes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest findings on Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR)
  • Explore updates in cosmological theories post-1988
  • Read revision 6 of "The First Three Minutes" for updated interpretations
  • Investigate other key works in cosmology for comparative analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of cosmology, physics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the historical context of the universe's early moments will benefit from this discussion.

gmax137
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Messages
3,152
Reaction score
3,715
This book was recently offered (and sold) in the Buy, Sell, Trade, Giveaway Book Marketplace section of the Forum.

That inspired me to pull out my copy (1988 "Updated Edition" from Basic Books). I read this probably 30 years ago. My question is, how much of this story is still considered valid? How much has been superseded over the years? Will reading it fill my head with obsolete notions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I hold an even older edition: "First Three Minutes" revison 1. When I learned -- from PF posts -- that revision 6 included Weinberg's interpretations of CMBr data, I checked the latest edition from our public library. Had a bit of fun reconciling original text with physics and cosmology learned since the 1970's but enjoyed the experience.

If you choose this route, be prepared for reading many footnotes and endnotes in small type, going by the edition I read. Even so, Weinberg always holds my attention.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: gmax137
gmax137 said:
This book was recently offered (and sold) in the Buy, Sell, Trade, Giveaway Book Marketplace section of the Forum.

That inspired me to pull out my copy (1988 "Updated Edition" from Basic Books). I read this probably 30 years ago. My question is, how much of this story is still considered valid? How much has been superseded over the years? Will reading it fill my head with obsolete notions?
I think mine disappeared during a move. Pfers always give it praise even though it is still a general readers book.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
35K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K