- #491
nsaspook
Science Advisor
- 1,349
- 3,564
OCR said:
I love those DUST 'shorts'.
OCR said:
Same for me. . . .nsaspook said:I love those DUST 'shorts'.
Several vehicles and one semi truck slowed down because of low visibility and eventually came to a stop, Thorson said. Then they got covered in tumbleweeds, rendering them unable to proceed.
The piles of tumbleweeds were as high as 20 to 30 feet in some places, Thorson said, blocking SR 240 around mile post 10, about 20 miles west of Richland in the south-central part of the state.
Although, a link found in the comments is worth taking a look at. It lightens the tone of this article.fresh_42 said:US town rejects solar panels amid fears they 'suck energy from the sun', cause cancer - and will harm house prices
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-up-all-the-energy-from-the-sun-a6771526.html
This doesn't make it less stupid, just a bit more sophisticated.jack action said:Although, a link found in the comments is worth taking a look at. It lightens the tone of this article.
Property value is debatable, yes. However, disrupting the ecosystem? Have you had a look at the landscape? The ecosystem has already been disrupted for decades. Human agriculture is at least as disrupting as some panels are. It is only that we are accustomed to it. But it won't pass a biological test on biodiversity.A North Carolina town rejected the further installation of solar panels; some residents registered fears that the panels would disrupt the local ecosystem, while many others worried property values would be affected.
These article URLs look suspiciously similar.fresh_42 said:US town rejects solar panels amid fears they 'suck energy from the sun', cause cancer - and will harm house prices
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-up-all-the-energy-from-the-sun-a6771526.html
Choppy said:{Dec 14, 2015}
Another Travesty of Science - Rejecting Solar Panels For...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-up-all-the-energy-from-the-sun-a6771526.html
Sometimes you don't know whether to laugh or to cry.
The first article makes it look like the decision was taken based on baloney science, as the second one shows a more realistic fear of creating a jobless town. The "scientific" comments are only from one or two citizens, speaking freely at a public comment period. There are always such misinformed and demagogue comments in those periods. That doesn't mean they were the basis for the decision.fresh_42 said:This doesn't make it less stupid, just a bit more sophisticated.
Property value is debatable, yes. However, disrupting the ecosystem? Have you had a look at the landscape? The ecosystem has already been disrupted for decades. Human agriculture is at least as disrupting as some panels are. It is only that we are accustomed to it. But it won't pass a biological test on biodiversity.
It was our own Government!jack action said:...The "scientific" comments are only from one or two citizens, speaking freely at a public comment period. There are always such misinformed and demagogue comments in those periods. That doesn't mean they were the basis for the decision.
nsaspook said:
But stressful events during pregnancy, such as natural disasters and terrorist attacks, have typically led to a temporary fall in the proportion of boys to girls born three to five months later.
This pattern has been seen after various events, including the 9/11 terrorist attacks in 2001, the 2004 Madrid bombings, the 2005 London bombings, and the 2011 killings in Norway.
So when there is trouble, does nature wants more women to clean up the mess or does it wants less men that are assumed to make it in the first place?fresh_42 said:
Isn't this an AND instead of on OR? However, I didn't really understand the article. I mean, how can sex change ##9 - [3,5]=[4,6]## months after the event? Must be a case of: "I told you this would end evil!"jack action said:So when there is trouble, does nature wants more women to clean up the mess or does it wants less men that are assumed to make it in the first place?
Is this a joke? If not, what is the explanation of how this happens? Do the stressful conditions change a boy fetus in the womb to a girl fetus? Or do boy fetuses miscarriage more frequently than girl fetuses under stressful conditions?fresh_42 said:But stressful events during pregnancy, . . . have typically led to a temporary fall in in the proportion of boys to girls three to five months later.
The district clinic in Groß-Gerau now has a corona drive-in. No, there is no takeaway Coronavirus here. Patients can now have themselves tested for the virus in their own cars, as the Groß-Gerauer Echo reports. Here's how it works: The patient drives up to the back of the hospital. There a medical specialist makes a nasal swab through the window. Then the patient drives home and waits for the test result. For the drive-in you have to register in the clinic beforehand. So don't just go there, call beforehand.
Australia’s virus-inspired mass run on toilet paper reached scary heights on Wednesday – with reports of a shopper with a knife at one Sydney supermarket, and a stampede at another.
And people in this thread seemed to be worried that a spreading virus could have a negative impact on the economy. I think this is proof that a virus scare is actually a boost for the economy.nsaspook said:
jack action said:And people in this thread seemed to be worried that a spreading virus could have a negative impact on the economy. I think this is proof that a virus scare is actually a boost for the economy.
Anyone from Maine here? Anyone?nsaspook said:A positive impact on Lobster eaters.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/virus-makes-lobsters-cheap-sellers-120000170.html
@davenn and all other southies: Don't hesitate to tell us if we should send packages by mail!In Australia, more and more hamster purchases appear to be turning into violence. The police have been called at least three times over the past few days because of tangible arguments over toilet paper: in a supermarket in Sydney, three women had yelled and pulled their hair, in another supermarket in the city a customer pulled a folding knife to get a pack of toilet paper secure and in a supermarket in Tamworth, police used a stun gun against a man who had become palpable in the dispute over a pack of toilet paper.