What Angle Does the Muon Emerge at in Pion Decay?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decay of a pion into a muon and a neutrino, specifically analyzing the angle at which the muon emerges when the neutrino is emitted at 90 degrees to the pion's original direction. The key equations utilized include conservation of four-momentum and the relativistic energy-momentum relationship. The final expression for the tangent of the angle, derived through momentum conservation, is tan(θ) = (m_π² - m_μ²) / (2γ²v)(m_π²). The participants emphasize the importance of incorporating the initial velocity of the pion into the calculations to simplify the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of four-momentum in particle physics
  • Familiarity with relativistic energy-momentum relations
  • Knowledge of conservation laws in particle decay
  • Basic grasp of Lorentz transformations and gamma factor (γ)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of four-momentum conservation in particle decay scenarios
  • Learn about the implications of relativistic effects on particle interactions
  • Explore the use of energy-mass-momentum relations in complex decay problems
  • Investigate the role of initial conditions, such as velocity, in particle decay analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in particle physics, particularly those focusing on decay processes and relativistic kinematics, will benefit from this discussion.

Flux = Rad
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I've done a countless number of these problems before, so I was quite annoyed when I was unable to do this one. It's from Griffiths' Intro to Elementary Particles.

Homework Statement



A pion traveling at speed v decays into a muon and a neutrino,
\pi^- \rightarrow \mu^- + \bar{\nu}_\mu
If the neutrino emerges at 90 degrees to the original pion direction, at what angle does the muon come off?

Homework Equations



Relativistic formulae for energy and momentum, energy and momentum conservation.

The Attempt at a Solution



Note: in the following I've set c = 1. If that bothers anyone too much, I could do it again keeping the c's in, but it's rather tedious.

I've set it up so that the pion was traveling in the \hat{x} direction, and the neutrino goes off in the \hat{y} direction.

The four vectors for the particles are:
P_\pi = \left( \begin{array}{cc} E_\pi / c \\ p_\pi \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \qquad P_\nu = \left( \begin{array}{cc} p_\nu \\ 0 \\ p_\nu \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \qquad P_\mu = \left( \begin{array}{cc} E_\mu / c \\ p_x \\ p_y \\ 0 \end{array} \right)

4 momentum conservation states that

P_\pi = P_\nu + P_\mu

Dotting both sides of this equation with itself, and noting that
a) the square of a 4 momentum is the rest mass of the particle
b) the neutrino is effectively massless
I get:

p_y = \frac{2 E_\mu p_\nu - m_\pi ^2 + m_\mu ^2}{2 p_\nu}

If I rearrange my initial statement of energy/momentum conservation to

P_\nu = P_\pi - P_\mu

the result of squaring this is

p_x = \frac{2 E_\pi E_\mu - m_\pi ^2 m_\mu ^2}{2 p_\pi}

This allows me to obtain an expression for the required angle, namely

\tan \theta = \frac{p_y}{p_x} = \frac{p_\pi (2 E_\mu p_\nu - m_\pi ^2 + m_\mu ^2)}{p_\nu (2 E_\pi E_\mu - m_\pi ^2 - m_\mu ^2)}

In order to get rid of the p_\nu terms, I take my conservation master equation and rearrange it to the last possible arrangement, and square:

P_\mu = P_\pi - P_\nu \quad \Rightarrow \quad P_\nu = \frac{m_\pi ^2 - m_\mu ^2}{2 E_\pi}

Substituting this into my rather messy equation for \tan \theta, I end up with:

\tan \theta = 2 \frac{p_\pi (E_\mu - E_\pi)}{2 E_\pi E_\mu - m_\pi ^2 m_\mu ^2}

Clearly this isn't satisfactory since we don't know what E_\mu is. I tried using the energy-mass-momentum relation to remedy this but I only managed to get

\tan \theta = 2 \frac{p_\pi(E_\mu - E_\pi)}{p_\mu ^2 - p_\pi ^2}

which isn't of much help either, since we now have unknown p_\mu terms floating about.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

I try this way:
P_\pi = \left( \begin{array}{cc} E_\pi / c \\ p_\pi \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \qquad P_\nu = \left( \begin{array}{cc} p_\nu \\ 0 \\ p_\nu \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \qquad P_\mu = \left( \begin{array}{cc} E_\mu / c \\ p_x \\ p_y \\ 0 \end{array} \right)
Actually,conservation of momentum give p_\pi=p_x and p_\nu=p_y
Therefore,
\tan\theta=\frac{p_y}{p_x}=\frac{p_\nu}{p_\pi}
where
p_\pi=\gamma m_\pi v
and
p_\nu = \frac{m_\pi ^2 - m_\mu ^2}{2 E_\pi} (you have got this relation)
Simplify further
\tan\theta=\frac{p_y}{p_x}=\frac{p_\nu}{p_\pi}=\frac{m_\pi ^2 - m_\mu ^2}{2 E_\pi}\frac{1}{\gamma m_\pi v}=\frac{m_\pi ^2 - m_\mu ^2}{2 \gamma m_\pi}\frac{1}{\gamma m_\pi v}=\frac{1}{2\gamma^2 v}\left(\frac{m_\pi ^2 - m_\mu ^2}{m^2_\pi}\right)



Best regards
 
Last edited:
Without following all of the details (sorry, it's getting late), but you haven't used at all the fact that you were given the initial velocity of the pion is 'v'. This gives you a relation between E_pi and p_pi in terms of v. That's one less variable.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the replies, I was making things way too complicated for myself. I'm not sure if the expression I got was correct but variation's method is far more elegant and uhm... logical. Hope that'll teach me to keep an eye on the bigger picture with simpler problems.

Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K