Scattering angle in relativistic kinematics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the scattering angle in relativistic kinematics for two particles, where one particle is at rest in the Lab frame. The key equation derived is the cosine of the scattering angle, given by $$\cos{\theta_{1}} = \frac{e_{1}'(e_{1} + m_{2}) - e_{1}m_{2} - m_{1}^{2}}{p_{1}p_{1}'}$$. The maximum scattering angle is expressed as $$\sin{\theta_{1\, max}} = \frac{m_{2}}{m_{1}}$$ when the rest mass of the incident particle is greater than that of the other particle. The discussion also highlights the complexity of simplifying the equation under relativistic conditions and suggests a reformulation for easier differentiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 4-momentum in relativistic physics
  • Familiarity with elastic collision equations
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities in physics
  • Basic calculus for differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of 4-momentum conservation in elastic collisions
  • Learn about relativistic kinematics and its applications
  • Explore Landau's "The Classical Theory of Fields" for deeper insights
  • Investigate methods for simplifying complex equations in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in particle physics, and anyone studying relativistic kinematics and scattering processes will benefit from this discussion.

kalok87
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Considering 2 scattering particles with momenta ##p_{1}, p_{2}##, where ##p_{2} = 0## in the Lab reference. The momenta of these 2 particles after elastic collision are ##p_{1}', p_{2}'##, respectively. Due to the 4-momentum relation, we have ##p_{1i}p_{1}^{'i} = e_{1}e_{1}' - p_{1} \cdot p_{1}' = e_{1}e_{1}' - p_{1} \cdot p_{1}' \cos{\theta_{1}}##, here ##\theta_{1}## is the angle of scattering of the incident particle ##m_{1}##, and the ##e_{1}## is the energy of particle ##m_{1}##. Finally we can derive the equation for scattering angle ##\theta_{1}##:

$$\cos{\theta_{1}} = \frac{e_{1}'(e_{1} + m_{2}) - e_{1}m_{2} - m_{1}^{2}}{p_{1}p_{1}'}$$

In Landau's book The Classical Theory of Fields, section 13, a function of ##\theta_{1}## is derived as follows if the rest mass of incident particle ##m_{1}## is larger than the mass of another particle ##m_{2}##:

$$\sin{\theta_{1\, max}} = \frac{m_{2}}{m_{1}}$$

But how could we derive this result?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


If we don't consider the relativity, an equation for ##\theta_{1}## can be derived:

$$\cos{\theta_{1}} = \frac{(1 + \alpha) \beta^{2} + 1 - \alpha}{2\beta}$$

where ##\alpha = \frac{m_{2}}{m_{1}}## and ##\beta = \frac{v_{1}'}{v_{1}}##. Since ##\alpha## is a constant, we can find the extreme of ##\theta_{1}## by treating ##\beta## as an independent variable.:

$$ \frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm d \beta}\cos{\theta_{1}} = 0$$

From above equation we obtain ##\cos{\theta_{1\, min}} = \frac{2\beta}{1 + \beta^{2}}## for ##\alpha = \frac{1 - \beta^{2}}{1 + \beta^{2}}##. Finally we get ##\sin{\theta_{1}}_{max} = \frac{m_{2}}{m_{1}}##.

But if we are considering the relativity, the equation for ##\theta_{1}## is hard to simplify. How can I resolve this? Thank you for the advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kalok87 said:
$$\cos{\theta_{1}} = \frac{e_{1}'(e_{1} + m_{2}) - e_{1}m_{2} - m_{1}^{2}}{p_{1}p_{1}'}$$
But if we are considering the relativity, the equation for ##\theta_{1}## is hard to simplify. How can I resolve this? Thank you for the advice.
It is messy, but it will work out. It might be helpful to write the above equation as $$\cos{\theta_{1}} = \frac{ae_{1}' -b}{p_{1}\sqrt{e_{1}'^2-m_1^2}}$$where ##a## and ##b## are certain constants. Show that the derivative of the right hand side equals zero when ##e_{1}' = \large \frac{a m_1^2}{b}##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
542
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K