What Are Curled-Up Dimensions and Their Implications?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bob3141592
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "curled-up dimensions," exploring their nature and implications within theoretical frameworks such as string theory. Participants engage in geometric interpretations, mathematical reasoning, and philosophical considerations regarding the existence and characteristics of these dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe "curled-up dimensions" using analogies from video games, suggesting that such dimensions could allow for a return to the starting point after moving a short distance.
  • Others argue that string theory's claims about curled dimensions lack empirical support and remain more philosophical than scientific.
  • A participant proposes a detailed geometric analogy involving maps to illustrate how one might perceive a curled-up dimension, questioning the difference between curled and non-curled dimensions.
  • Another participant suggests that a curled dimension could allow for different experiences of motion, as demonstrated by sending light beams in opposite directions and observing their collision points.
  • Some participants introduce speculative ideas about semi-curled dimensions and dimensions that do not interact with others, raising questions about their existence and implications.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of mathematical theories and their relationship to reality, with some participants expressing skepticism about the existence of mathematically consistent but unobservable dimensions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the nature or implications of curled-up dimensions. Some agree on the conceptual differences between curled and non-curled dimensions, while others challenge the validity of these concepts without empirical evidence.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding curled dimensions, including the dependence on definitions and the lack of observable evidence for certain theoretical constructs. The discussion remains open-ended regarding the implications of these dimensions.

  • #31
Hurkyl said:
Fortunately, things become simpler when the dimension is very tiny (e.g. if quarks can 'span' the entire dimension) -- you simply don't (directly) detect it at all!

Yes indeed, Hurkyl. But then it's hard to say what curled-up dimensions are "like" and, with the rest of folk beyond the standard model, one is left literally grasping at straws (or strings?), not having detected anything new lately!

Let's hope that the LHC soon turns up something new, if it doesn't blow us all to Hades.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Dcase said:
Curled-up dimensions have been discussed in papers ...and probably others... the ubiquity of helices...

Add:

7. It's very old and all relative: "..a geometrically straight, but eccentric (line) line parallel to the axis of a twisted (crystal lattice) is in fact a helical line in lattice coordinates" Phil.Mag. 34, 1105 (1958).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K