Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the concept of n-dimensional holes in topology, particularly focusing on their definitions and implications within homology and homotopy theory. Participants explore the relationship between these holes and the ability to continuously shrink cycles within various topological spaces, examining both theoretical and intuitive understandings of the term "hole."
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants propose defining n-dimensional holes as non-zero homology or homotopy classes of a topological space.
- Others argue that the first homotopy group relates to cycles that can be shrunk to a point, while the second homotopy group addresses obstructions related to two-dimensional spheres.
- A participant questions the intuitive understanding of what constitutes a hole, suggesting that a closed n-manifold may create a hole if it surrounds a compact (n+1) dimensional volume.
- There is a discussion about the Klein bottle and its classification as a boundary, despite having a second homotopy group of zero, raising questions about the nature of holes detected by torsion homology or homotopy classes.
- One participant reflects on the complexity of defining holes, noting that they may exist under certain coefficient rings but not others, indicating a nuanced understanding of the concept.
- Another participant suggests that the term "holes" may originate from the classification of two-dimensional orientable surfaces based on the number of toroidal holes.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express multiple competing views on the definition and implications of n-dimensional holes, and the discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.
Contextual Notes
Participants highlight the dependence on definitions and the potential for different interpretations of holes in various contexts, such as homology and homotopy theory.