Undergrad What Are Pileups? Explanation & Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silviu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Pileups in particle physics refer to additional proton-proton collisions that occur alongside the primary interaction of interest, complicating data analysis. There are two types of pileups: in-time, which arises from collisions within the same proton bunch crossing, and out-of-time, which occurs when signals from previous bunch crossings interfere due to detector deadtime. High-pT cuts, such as pT > 10 GeV, are effective in reducing the impact of low-energy pileup events. Accurate identification of pileup requires careful analysis and simulation, as it cannot be determined prior to data evaluation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle collision dynamics
  • Familiarity with Primary Vertex (PV) concepts
  • Knowledge of silicon detector technology and time resolution
  • Experience with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of high-pT cuts on data quality in particle physics
  • Study the principles of Primary Vertex identification techniques
  • Explore the effects of detector deadtime on data collection
  • Learn about Monte Carlo simulation methods for estimating pileup events
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, data analysts in high-energy physics experiments, and researchers working with collision data from particle accelerators will benefit from this discussion.

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! Can someone explain to me what pileups are? I read some stuff but I am not sure I understand. So, if you collide a bunch of protons looking for something, from what I understood pileups are the other proton-proton collisions that don't give you the interaction of interest? However, I understand that in particle accelerators they try to get rid of pileups, but how can you know before doing any analysis on the data if a certain interaction is a pileup or the interaction you are looking for?
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. Pileup comes when the detector measures objects that do not come from the Primary Vertex (PV), where the hard scattering occurs. There are two types of pileup: in-time and out-of-time.
The first (intime) comes from the same proton bunch crossing. You can determine the interaction points by identifying vertices, and comparing their distances to the PV.
The second occurs when other bunches cross and your detector has not yet recorded the signal completely (eg due to deadtime). The silicon detectors are having a good time resolution of ~25ns (as much as the time that bunches cross), and so the out-of-time pileup is determined by the silicon detectors (in pseudorapidity region \eta < 2).
Also in general, pileup events are low energetic. So, by applying high-pT cuts (eg pT>10GeV etc), you throw away most of it.
Pileup is not known before you look at data- you can estimate it by simulations (MC), but in the end you will have to apply correction weights to your MC to bring it to agree with the observed data's interactions.
 
Last edited:
Interesting collisions are rare, so the experiments usually try to get as many as possible. You can't change the bunch spacing (one bunch crossing every 25 ns at the LHC), so you need many collisions per bunch crossing.

The definition which collision is the one you are looking at comes from your analysis. If you search for two electrons (random example), and find two in an event, then the collision producing those two electrons is the one you are interested in, and all other collisions are called pileup: It is not what you are interested in, but it can disturb the measurement. You try to remove the impact from these pileup collisions in your analysis.
It can also happen that one electron comes from one collision and the other one from a different collision - that is also an effect of pileup you have to take into account (although it is very rare, especially with electrons).
 
The example of out-of-time pileup (the second kind) is not the best. It takes time for your signal to form in your detector. For a scintillator-calorimeter, it is around 60ns, so 2-1/2 bunch crossings: so when you measure the energy, you may have leakage from past events. For other detectors, even more - if you use drift tubes to measure muons, they can have drift times as long as a microsecond or even more: so you are integrating over 50 or more crossings.
 
Well, for the calorimeter here : http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.09324 (last paragraph of Section 3.1) they say that the calorimeter parts can take up to 450ns for the charge collection time. Also the same paragraph gives a short answer to the OP ..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K