What Are Shankar's Inner Product Axioms in Quantum Mechanics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Shankar's inner product axioms in quantum mechanics as presented in "Principles of Quantum Mechanics." The key axioms include the conjugate symmetry, positivity, and linearity properties of the inner product. Specifically, the inner product is defined as \(\langle V|W\rangle = \langle W|V\rangle^*\), \(\langle V|V\rangle \geq 0\) with equality if and only if \(|V\rangle = |0\rangle\), and the linearity property \(\langle V|(a|W\rangle +b|Z\rangle) = a\langle V|W \rangle +b\langle V|Z \rangle\). The inner product can be expressed in terms of basis vectors as \(\langle V|W \rangle = \sum_i \sum_j v_i^*w_j\langle i|j \rangle\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with linear algebra concepts, particularly inner product spaces
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their properties
  • Basic mathematical skills in summation notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inner product spaces in linear algebra
  • Explore quantum mechanics textbooks that cover Hilbert spaces and their applications
  • Learn about the significance of conjugate symmetry in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of basis vectors in quantum state representation
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, particularly those studying linear algebra and inner product spaces, as well as educators and researchers looking to deepen their understanding of quantum state representations.

Identity
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
I was reading "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" - Shankar, and I'm having trouble understanding the inner product. Can someone help me or link me to a site that explains it?

The axioms of the inner product are

1. [tex]\langle V|W\rangle = \langle W|V\rangle^*[/tex]

2. [tex]\langle V|V\rangle \geq 0\ \ \ \ \ 0 \ \ iff\ \ |V\rangle = |0\rangle[/tex]

3. [tex]\langle V|(a|W\rangle +b|Z\rangle ) \equiv \langle V|aW+bZ\rangle = a\langle V|W \rangle +b\langle V|Z \rangle[/tex]

Given that [tex]|V\rangle[/tex] and [tex]|W \rangle[/tex] can be expressed in terms of their basis vectors,

[tex]|V \rangle = \sum_i v_i |i \rangle[/tex]

[tex]|W \rangle = \sum_j w_j|j \rangle[/tex]

Shankar says "we follow the axioms obeyed by the inner product to obtain"

[tex]\langle V|W \rangle = \sum_i \sum_j v_i^*w_j\langle i|j \rangle[/tex]

I don't understand how this comes about?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Identity said:
I was reading "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" - Shankar, and I'm having trouble understanding the inner product. Can someone help me or link me to a site that explains it?

The axioms of the inner product are

1. [tex]\langle V|W\rangle = \langle W|V\rangle^*[/tex]

2. [tex]\langle V|V\rangle \geq 0\ \ \ \ \ 0 \ \ iff\ \ |V\rangle = |0\rangle[/tex]

3. [tex]\langle V|(a|W\rangle +b|Z\rangle ) \equiv \langle V|aW+bZ\rangle = a\langle V|W \rangle +b\langle V|Z \rangle[/tex]

Given that [tex]|V\rangle[/tex] and [tex]|W \rangle[/tex] can be expressed in terms of their basis vectors,

[tex]|V \rangle = \sum_i v_i |i \rangle[/tex]

[tex]|W \rangle = \sum_j w_j|j \rangle[/tex]

Shankar says "we follow the axioms obeyed by the inner product to obtain"

[tex]\langle V|W \rangle = \sum_i \sum_j v_i^*w_j\langle i|j \rangle[/tex]

I don't understand how this comes about?

thanks

What is your mathematical background? In most basic abstract algebra courses and even some linear algebra courses you will go into inner products and inner product spaces.
 
Oh I just finished high school and I'm trying to occupying myself in the holidays

(actually nevermind I was able to get it with some help from a friend)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K