What are the best books to explore hyperbolic trigonometry?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on recommended literature for exploring hyperbolic trigonometry, particularly the functions cosh and sinh. Key suggestions include "Hyperbolic Functions: With Configuration Theorems and Equivalent and Equidecomposable Figures," and "Visual Complex Analysis" by Tristan Needham, which elucidates the relationship between traditional and hyperbolic trigonometric functions through complex numbers. Additionally, "Geometry" (2nd Edition) by Brannan is noted for its self-contained chapter on hyperbolic geometry. The conversation highlights a distinction between interest in hyperbolic functions and a broader exploration of hyperbolic geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hyperbolic functions (cosh, sinh)
  • Familiarity with complex numbers
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometry
  • Introductory geometry concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Visual Complex Analysis" by Tristan Needham
  • Explore "Geometry" (2nd Edition) by Brannan for hyperbolic geometry
  • Investigate "Hyperbolic Functions: With Configuration Theorems and Equivalent and Equidecomposable Figures"
  • Study the connections between hyperbolic and traditional trigonometric functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those interested in advanced trigonometry, geometry, and the applications of hyperbolic functions in various mathematical contexts.

ciubba
Messages
65
Reaction score
2
My calc. 2 book more or less only mentioned the hyperbolic functions to make integration easier, so, now that I have some free time, I'd like to explore the area further. Could someone recommend a good book on the subject or do I need to take more math first?

A quick google search revealed "Hyperbolic Functions: With Configuration Theorems and Equivalent and Equidecomposable Figures," which sounds about what I'm looking for, but I can't find a preview of the book.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
verty said:
This one would work: Van Brummelen - Introduction to Non-Euclidean Geometry. But I don't like this subject myself and wouldn't bother (I find it uninteresting, is all).

Why not learn spherical trig instead? Van Brummelen - Heavenly Matter, The Forgotten Art of Spherical Trigonometry.

Is that really what the OP wants? It was my impression he was only interested in learning a bit more about the cosh and sinh functions. I don't think it was his purpose to really do trigonometry on the hyperbolic plane. Nevertheless, if it was his purpose to learn this anyway, then I recommend Brannan: http://www.cambridge.org/be/academic/subjects/mathematics/geometry-and-topology/geometry-2nd-edition The chapter on hyperbolic geometry is mostly self-contained.

The book "Visual complex analysis" by Needhamhttp://[URL='https://www.amazon.com...omplex-Analysis-Tristan-Needham/dp/0198534469[/URL] gives the deep connections between the usual trig functions and the hyperbolic trig functions by using complex numbers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
micromass said:
Is that really what the OP wants? It was my impression he was only interested in learning a bit more about the cosh and sinh functions. I don't think it was his purpose to really do trigonometry on the hyperbolic plane. Nevertheless, if it was his purpose to learn this anyway, then I recommend Brannan: http://www.cambridge.org/be/academic/subjects/mathematics/geometry-and-topology/geometry-2nd-edition The chapter on hyperbolic geometry is mostly self-contained.

When he said "the area", I thought he meant hyperbolic geometry. I thought it piqued his interest that there might be a hyperbolic geometry and he wanted to know more about that. Because when I first saw sinh and cosh, what sprang to mind is, wow, there must be hyperbolic triangles, I want to know more. I did warn him off it as well, pointing out that I didn't think it was worth looking into.

The book "Visual complex analysis" by Needhamhttp://[URL='https://www.amazon.com...omplex-Analysis-Tristan-Needham/dp/0198534469[/URL] gives the deep connections between the usual trig functions and the hyperbolic trig functions by using complex numbers.

Hmm, I thought the connection was the formula cosh^2 - sinh^2 = 1 which is superficially very similar to cos^2 + sin^2 = 1 (this is honestly hand on my heart what I concluded when I first researched them some years ago), and that they are therefore useful for integration for the same reasons that the trig functions are useful. And perhaps this connection is enough for him in this direction as well, if he doesn't want to learn a whole lot of extra stuff.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
11K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
12K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K