I What are the Eigenvalues of the Hermitian Inverse \(H^{-1}\)?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hermitian Inverse
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the eigenvalues of the Hermitian inverse \(H^{-1}\) of a negative eigenvalue Hermitian matrix \(H\). The integral \(G = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{tH} dt\) is shown to equal \(H^{-1}\), leading to the conclusion that \(G\mathbf{e}_i = -\frac{1}{\lambda_i} \mathbf{e}_i\). This raises the question of whether \(H^{-1}\) should have eigenvalues of \(1/\lambda_i\), given that \(H\mathbf{e}_i = \lambda_i \mathbf{e}_i\). The analysis confirms that \(G = -H^{-1}\), which resolves the apparent contradiction. The discussion highlights the nuances of eigenvalue relationships in Hermitian matrices.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,098
Reaction score
1,385
##H## is an ##n\times n## Hermitian matrix with eigenvectors ##\mathbf{e}_i## and all eigenvalues negative. It's claimed that ##G = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{tH} dt## is such that ##G = H^{-1}##. I was looking at\begin{align*}
G\mathbf{e}_i &= \int_0^{\infty} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{t^n}{n!} H^n \mathbf{e}_i dt = \mathbf{e}_i\int_0^{\infty} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{t^n \lambda_i^n}{n!} dt = \mathbf{e}_i \int_0^{\infty} e^{\lambda_i t} dt = - \frac{1}{\lambda_i} \mathbf{e}_i
\end{align*}which is weird, because ##\mathbf{e}_i = H^{-1} H\mathbf{e}_i = \lambda_i H^{-1} \mathbf{e}_i## so ##H^{-1}## should have eigenvalues ##1/\lambda_i##?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you try ##H = -I## you'll see you are correct. ##G = -H^{-1}##.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
Thanks, I'm surprised. It's part of an old exam question!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top