What Are the Implications of 4D Space on Physics and Reality?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition and implications of 4D space, particularly how it might redefine our understanding of physics and reality. Participants explore theoretical frameworks, applications, and the potential consequences of higher dimensions in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks about the definition and implications of 4D space, seeking to understand how it could change current physics and reality.
  • Another participant mentions that some theories, such as string theory, require up to ten spatial dimensions.
  • A participant explains that special relativity operates in 4D space, highlighting differences from classical Newtonian mechanics, which only considers three dimensions.
  • This participant discusses the concept of "rotating" dimensions, suggesting that transformations in higher dimensions could allow for mixing of time and spatial dimensions, leading to effects like Lorentz length contraction and time dilation.
  • The idea of introducing a fifth dimension is proposed, where electric charge could be linked to momentum, suggesting new transformations and conserved quantities associated with these dimensions.
  • Another participant questions the relationship between 4D space and entanglement, leading to a response that claims they are unrelated concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of 4D space and its relationship to concepts like entanglement. There is no consensus on the connection between 4D space and entanglement, as one participant asserts they are unrelated while another raises the question.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific theoretical frameworks, such as Kaluza-Klein theories, which may not be universally accepted. The discussion includes speculative ideas about higher dimensions and their implications, which may not be fully resolved.

eextreme
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
What is the definition and implications of 4D space?

By implications I mean if it existed how will it redefine what we know about physics and reality up to now. (Applications, possibilities, etc)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are some current, active theories (such as string theory) that require as many as ten spatial dimensions.
 
Special relativity is a theory in 4D space.

What does it change? There is a difference to the classical Newton mechanics which postulates only 3 dimensions. In Newtonian mechanics we can rotate the coordination system to transform spatial axes one into another.

Adding the fourth dimension (identified with time) allows us to "rotate" over new axes, that means to transform time dimension into spatial ones and vice versa. That means, one observer's time may be mixed with another observer's length. This "rotation" in the fourth dimension is exactly the Lorenz transformation. Lorentz length contraction and time dilation are the effects of looking at an object from different "angles" in the fourth dimension.

Postulating more dimensions gives us just that: the ability to transform some physical quantity into another, specifically length and time. Suppose we postulate the fifth dimension and we identify the electric charge with the momentum in that dimension. So, there must exist a transformation ("rotation") transforming charge into length and time the Lagrangian is invariant under.

These "rotation" transformations in higher dimensions usually have conserved quantities associated with them. Just as the angular momentum is associated with rotation transformation. Postulating the fourth dimension (time) gives us another conserved quantity associated with the resulting rotation group - the spin. That's why many authors write that the existence of spin is relativistic effect. If we postulate the fifth dimension identified with the electric charge, we also get a new spin-like quantity - the isospin. That's why I believe the Kaluza-Klein theories, but that's my personal preference.

Postulating more dimensions implicitly assumes that translations in these dimensions are symmetries. This is not a problem with the time dimension, since it has been translation-symmetrical since the Newtonian dynamics, but with fifth (electrical) dimension this means that there have to exist elementary particles with arbitrary high electric charge. This is called the Kaluza-Klein tower. The hypothetical elementary particle with 2e electric charge is called dilepton and it has been looked for.
 
So does "entanglement" have anything to do with 4d space?
 
So does "entanglement" have anything to do with 4d space?
No, this is completely unrelated concept.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
654
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K