Nicool003
well one website (the drudge report) is very good I find it to usually be faster than the media and it hasn't failed me yet.
What Are the Implications of Shock and Awe Tactics in Baghdad?
- Topic: News
- Thread starter Adam
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Shock
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
72 replies · 13K views
kyleb
the drudge good for many things, i would definitely not use it as my only source though.
Nicool003
I didn't say it was my ONLY source...
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 1,958
- 7
You may be upset about the war, but the US is not "bombing the hell out of Baghdad". It is bombing the hell out of the military/government targets in Baghdad. There is a huge effort to avoid civilian deaths.
Iraq on the other hand is reportedly using its civilians as shields and killing those (or the families of those) who refuse to fight.
Mentor
- 23,902
- 11,357
Two conveniently ignored, yet hugely important points.
kyleb
i think they are both good points, the latter as well as the fact that the "huge effort" is still leaving many civilians in its wake were things i expected when this war was proposed in the first place.
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 1,958
- 7
I should add that, at least in Basra, it would seem that the Iraq military is not letting the cilivians flee the city (shooting/mortar shelling groups trying to leave). The are keeping the civilians in harm's way, I suspect, in order to cause more civilian deaths so they can win the political war. I think Iraq knows it can't beat the Coalition military toe-to-toe, but they think they can win the propaganda war (and so far, they are doing well at that).
kyleb
ya, unfortnatly when you back people into a corner they often start pulling every dirty trick in the book. 
Mentor
- 23,902
- 11,357
So murdering your own people is just a "dirty trick"? Wow, is that all the Iraqi people are worth? These "dirty tricks" may land Saddam in front of a a Nurenberg firing squad and they are on par with the things that Stalin and Hitler did to their own people.
Certainly civilian casualties were expected - they are in fact unaviodable in a war. But how many do you think we have killed? by my estimate if we believe without question the reports of Iraqi tv, we've killed something like 150. Considering the tonnage we've dropped on Iraq, that's an extrordinarily small number.
kyleb
well when it comes down to the honest action or dirty trick line, which side would you put it on russ?
damgo
Like he's going to end up anyplace else anyways? That's the problem with leaving people with nothing to lose: They don't fight fair. If hiding in cities and guerrilla tactics are the only way the Iraqis can fight back, that's how their going to fight back.
kat
- 45
- 0
I'm sorry, but I don't care what the circumstances are fair/Saddam's regime is an oxymoron.
Mentor
- 23,902
- 11,357
Well that was just an illustration - I think he's dead already.
when it comes down to the green or beaver line, which side would you put it on, kyle? What an utterly meaningless question.