MHB What are the intervals on the number line for | x + 5 | ≥ 2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    intervals
AI Thread Summary
The inequality | x + 5 | ≥ 2 indicates that x is at least two units away from -5 on the number line. This results in two intervals: x ≥ -3 and x ≤ -7. The solution can be represented as the intervals (-∞, -7] and [-3, ∞). Both intervals correctly reflect the conditions set by the inequality. The discussion confirms the accuracy of these intervals.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
The set of real numbers satisfying the given inequality is one or more intervals on the number line. Show each interval on the number line.

1. | x - 1 | < or = 1/2

Solution:

-1/2 < or = x - 1 < or = 1/2

(-1/2) + 1 < or = x < or = (1/2) + 1

1/2 < or = x < or = 3/2

----[1/2-------3/2]----

Correct?

2. | x + 5 | ≥ 2

Solution:

This question says that x is at least two units away from 5 on the number line.

x + 5 ≥ 2

x ≥ 2 - 5

x ≥ - 3

or

x + 5 ≤ -2

x ≤ - 2 - 5

x ≤ - 7

<---- -7]------[-3---->

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Both are correct.
 
It surely feels good to be right.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top