What Are the Key Differences Between Transfer Impedance and Admittance in EMC?

  • Thread starter Thread starter madking153
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of transfer impedance and admittance in the context of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), particularly focusing on cable shielding. Participants raise questions about the assumptions underlying transfer impedance measurements and the differences between transfer impedance and admittance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why the assumption of λ >> L is necessary when measuring transfer impedance for cable shielding, suggesting it may relate to avoiding standing waves.
  • Others clarify that transfer impedance is used to characterize the coupling of external fields to a shielded cable, with a mathematical relationship provided for induced voltage.
  • One participant mentions that admittance is the reciprocal of impedance and discusses the implications of mismatched characteristic impedance on signal reflections.
  • Another participant notes that transfer impedance is commonly used in EMC current injection tests to simplify calculations involving coupled impedances.
  • There is a mention of the potential confusion between transfer impedance and characteristic impedance, with some participants seeking further clarification on the terms.
  • One participant shares insights from a translation of German sources, indicating that reflections and impedance mismatches are relevant to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with transfer impedance, leading to a lack of consensus on its implications and applications. Multiple competing views on the necessity of the λ >> L assumption and the definitions of transfer impedance and admittance remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight limitations in their understanding of transfer impedance and request additional context or resources, indicating that the discussion may benefit from more foundational knowledge in EMC and cable shielding.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in electromagnetic compatibility, cable shielding techniques, and the mathematical relationships between impedance and admittance in electrical engineering contexts.

madking153
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
HI,
I got some questions regarding Electromagnetic Compatibility:

1. When we measure transfer impedance for cable shielding , why we have assume that lamda >> L ?

2. What is the difference between trasnfer impedance & admittance?

My friend told me that the impedance in purely dependent conductor size , is it correct?


3. How to convert dbμv to normal v?



thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For #3, 1dBuV = 20 log (Vpp/1uV)

So if you have a value for the amplitude of a waveform in Vpp, you calculate the value in dBuV using the equation above.

As for your transfer impedance questions, I'm going to have to do some reading before I can attempt an answer...
 
thanks for the reply , I really need to know why lamda >> L .. pls help
 
madking153 said:
thanks for the reply , I really need to know why lamda >> L .. pls help

I've been kicking around some PMs (personal messages) with other members, but so far none of us are very familiar with the term transfer impedance, and especially the questions you ask about it.

The usual reason for a requirement like \lambda >> L would be to avoid the case of standing waves on whatever the cable is that you are measuring. But again, since I know nothing about transfer impedance, I cannot say that's the reason.

Could you please share with us what you know about transfer impedance so far? What is the context -- audio, Ethernet, some field bus, etc? Can you point us to some online sources of info about the subject? Wikipedia.org was no help for me, and my semi-brief google search wasn't much help either. What class is this from?
 
The main subject of it is about cable shielding in electromagnetic compatibility. I've googling myself but nothing much info about it.

I got some answers from german , after translate is something like this ( dotn know correct or not ):

1. reflection produces ripples
2. to against strong reflection in the end that doenst fit
 
I think you are referring to a "characteristic impedance."

50 ohms or 75 ohm for coax.

Admittance is just the reciprocal of impedance, Y = 1/Z


If you mismatch the source and load impedance with the characteristic impedance, that's when reflections start to occur that degrade your signal.
 
Transfer impedance Z_t is used to characterize the coupling of external fields to a shielded cable. The voltage induced in the inner conductor by currents flowing in the shield, in a short length dz, is given by
dV = Z_t * I * dz

You can find the cuurent induced in a load impedance by integrating over the cable length. If lambda>>L, then the integral becomes simple because I and V are constant throughout L. This is often not a valid assumption, however. Things get really messy if lamdba the same or smaller than L, since wave effects (standing waves, as mentioned earlier), resonances, and electromagnetic scattering then become important.

Admittance is the inverse of impedance. Most people are familiar with the characteristic impedance of a transmission line, as what noted. I suppose you could work with transfer admittance in this case if you like.

I suggest you get a hold of one of the better books on EMC or cable shielding for more info.
 
1. As already quoted if Lambda is large with respect to the cable length the cable acts as an Antenna so you need to look at it differently than just a cable with coupling.

2. The use of Transfer Impedance is generally used when doing EMC current injection tests. It is effectively treating the coupling from the injection probe as an impedance which makes calculations simpler especially when using lots of calibrated items in the test set-up as you can just add and subtract the impedances in the frequancy domain to determine the coupling applicable to the IUT and to pre-calibrate your test to ensure you get the right test levels into the IUT.

3. Refer to Berkmans answer
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K