What Are the Key Insights of the Binomial Series Homework Statement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zorro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties and relationships of binomial coefficients, specifically in the context of sums involving sigma notation. Participants are exploring the implications of different summation expressions and their equivalences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the number of sigma signs in the expressions and the implications of the conditions on the indices of summation. There is an exploration of how different summation setups affect the total number of terms and potential relationships between the sums.

Discussion Status

Several participants are engaging in a back-and-forth regarding the structure of the sums and their differences. Some have suggested specific terms and relationships, while others are attempting to derive equations to clarify these relationships. The conversation appears to be productive, with participants actively exploring the mathematical implications.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the conditions imposed on the indices of summation, particularly the requirement that one index must be less than the other. This condition is central to the discussion and affects the interpretation of the sums being analyzed.

zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



ue&space;of}\sum_{0\leq&space;r<&space;s\leq&space;n}\sum&space;(C_{r}&space;&plus;&space;C_{s}).gif

The Attempt at a Solution



Is there any difference between the above expression and
gif.latex?\sum_{r=0}^{n}\sum_{s=0}^{n}(C_{r}&plus;C_{s}).gif
?

Is there any relation between these two?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abdul Quadeer said:

Homework Statement



ue&space;of}\sum_{0\leq&space;r<&space;s\leq&space;n}\sum&space;(C_{r}&space;&plus;&space;C_{s}).gif

Are you sure there are up to 2 sigma signs in that expression? By the way, you mean [tex]C_r^n[/tex] right?

If there's just one sigma, then [tex]\sum_{0 \le r < s \le n} (C_r^n + C_s^n)[/tex] is different from [tex]\sum_{r = 0}^n \sum_{s = 0}^n (C_r^n + C_s^n)[/tex].

In the first sum [tex]\sum_{0 \le r < s \le n} (C_r^n + C_s^n)[/tex], r, and s can take any value raging from 0 to n, but r must be less than s.

However, in the second sum: [tex]\sum_{r = 0}^n \sum_{s = 0}^n (C_r^n + C_s^n)[/tex], r, and s can take any value raging from 0 to n, no more requirement is needed.

So, in general, the second sum will have more terms than the first sum.
 
Hi Abdul! :smile:

The second one is roughly double the first, since it contains eg C1 + C2 but not C2 + C1.

hmm … what about all the terms such as C1 + C1 ? :rolleyes:

can you find an exact equation for the difference between the second and twice the first? :smile:
 
VietDao29 said:
Are you sure there are up to 2 sigma signs in that expression?

Yeah there are 2 sigma signs. 0<=r<s<=n is in between the two sigma signs.

tiny-tim said:
can you find an exact equation for the difference between the second and twice the first?

Does that equate to
gif.latex?\sum_{r=0}^{n}(C_{r}&space;&plus;&space;C_{r}).gif
?
 
Yes, except i'd call it 2 ∑Cr :smile:

ok now write ∑∑ (Cr + Cs) over all r and s in terms of ∑Cr :wink:

(try it first with an easy small number for n, like n = 3, if you're stuck)
 
Thanks!... I got the answer :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K