What are the limitations of using electrical circuits to solve PDEs?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the limitations of using electrical circuits, particularly analog circuits, to solve partial differential equations (PDEs). Participants explore the feasibility of this approach, the nature of solutions it can provide, and the challenges associated with it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the general applicability of using electrical circuits to solve PDEs, suggesting that it may not be straightforward or universally applicable.
  • There is a distinction made between analog and digital circuits, with a focus on analog circuits like capacitors and inductors for solving PDEs.
  • One participant references Leon Chua's work, indicating that while there are methods to model PDEs with electrical circuits, it may not lead to analytical solutions.
  • Concerns are raised about the limitations of this approach, including potential issues with precision and the nature of the solutions being numerical rather than analytical.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the existence of examples where electrical circuits are effectively used to model PDEs, noting that most familiar examples involve ordinary differential equations (ODEs).
  • There is a suggestion that while approximations of PDE solutions might be possible with electrical circuits, the feasibility of obtaining analytical solutions remains unclear.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the effectiveness of using electrical circuits to solve PDEs. Multiple competing views are presented regarding the nature of solutions (analytical vs. numerical) and the practicality of the approach.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential for low precision in results and the transition to digital emulation as noted in referenced works. The discussion also highlights a lack of clarity on specific examples of PDEs modeled by electrical circuits.

Domenico94
Messages
130
Reaction score
6
Hi everyone. In electrical engineering, when you study control theory, you're taught that electrical circuits can be used to simulate the behaviour of complex systems. What I don't understand is, what are the limitation of this sistem, and why it can't be obviouslly used in a general way to solve PDEs? Does it give only numerical and not analitical solutions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All computers are electrical circuits, so your teachings were correct. Or are you asking this question for analog circuits (as opposed to digital circuits) in particular ?

Anyway, there are obvious size limitations.

And who claims they can't be used in a general way ?
 
Yes, it is true that they are, but I was asking it in the sense of using analog circuits, like capacitors, inductors,eventually diodes, to actually find a solution for Partial differential equations. There are engineers, like one named Leon Chua, who did significant work in solving equations using this approach. The thing I wanted to ask is, if it was so easy (Example : I want to solve a PDE, so I build the circuit and see how that works), we would all to this, but I guess it's not so simple as it appears, so what are the problems concerned with this kind of approach? Can be used for analitical solutions or for numerical solutions only?
 
Domenico94 said:
(Example : I want to solve a PDE, so I build the circuit and see how that works)
I've seen lots of examples of simple electrical systems modeled by ordinary differential equations (ODEs), but haven't seen any that were modeled by partial differential equations (PDEs). In the examples I've seen the voltage and current were functions of t alone. Did you mean ODEs instead of PDEs, or do you have some example where the current and voltage were functions of two or more variables?

I'm not an electrical engineer, so there might be some examples that I'm not aware of.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Domenico94
Mark44 said:
I've seen lots of examples of simple electrical systems modeled by ordinary differential equations (ODEs), but haven't seen any that were modeled by partial differential equations (PDEs). In the examples I've seen the voltage and current were functions of t alone. Did you mean ODEs instead of PDEs, or do you have some example where the current and voltage were functions of two or more variables?

I'm not an electrical engineer, so there might be some examples that I'm not aware of.
No, I don't mean electrical circuits being modeled by ODE, of course there are, but I was asking about the inverse problem, when we can model PDEs with electric circuits ( like Leon Chua did, for example)
 
Other answers??
 
Domenico94 said:
like Leon Chua did, for example
This man is so productive that he lists 767 references for CHua's circuit and chua's equation alone (in 2004). Plus his own publications, another 459. Could you narrow it down a little and explain what you are referring to ?

I mean, you can try to approximate PDE solutions with electric circuits, but that's not what you mean, is it ?

Re post #1: is it clear that you definitely don't get analytical solutions ?
 
Hi ByU :)
I was referring about the fact of solving nonlinear PDEs electric circuits, in a way like Chua did.
No, that's what I was not clear about...I just wanted to ask about the possibility of solving them analitically, or if it isn't feasible at all...Just for curiosity, nothing more :)
 
Found some http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=473591&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel4%2F81%2F9993%2F00473591.pdf%3Farnumber%3D473591 on Cellular Neural Networks but http://www.functionaldifferentialequations.com/index.php/fde/article/viewFile/197/160complain the results can't be used in real life (low precision, ..) and they change over to digital emulation.
 
  • #10
Cellular Neural Networks...It's always Chua's work, isn't it?
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
583
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K