What are the main challenges in developing space-based solar power systems?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The main challenges in developing space-based solar power systems include high launch costs, estimated at $10,000 per pound, and the complexities of power transmission from satellites to Earth. Key considerations involve the choice between laser beams and microwaves for energy transmission, as well as the potential use of high-altitude helium balloons to minimize atmospheric interference. Additionally, energy storage solutions, such as supercapacitors, face limitations in long-term energy retention, necessitating exploration of alternative storage methods. The feasibility of establishing receiving stations in remote or uninhabited areas is also a critical factor in the economic viability of these systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of space launch costs and logistics
  • Knowledge of power transmission methods, specifically laser and microwave technologies
  • Familiarity with energy storage solutions, particularly supercapacitors
  • Awareness of geostationary orbit dynamics and atmospheric effects
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest advancements in laser and microwave power transmission technologies
  • Explore alternative energy storage methods beyond supercapacitors, such as lithium-ion batteries or flywheels
  • Investigate the feasibility of deploying receiving stations in remote locations for space-based solar power
  • Study the environmental impacts and safety regulations associated with high-intensity microwave transmission
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, researchers, and policymakers involved in renewable energy, aerospace engineering, and environmental science will benefit from this discussion on the challenges and potential solutions in space-based solar power systems.

shashankac655
What is the biggest hurdle for building a space based solar power system?

is it the cost? All the space faring countries can come together and launch each part separately and then assemble them together just like the ISS right?

Is it the transmission of power from the satellite to Earth the problem?
Which part of the Earth has lowest atmospheric density?is it the polar regions? i don't know (i am thinking about laser beams)

Considering the satellite to be at a geostationary orbit .
Is it possible to have huge helium balloons along with receivers at a very high altitude to receive the laser beam(or microwaves ,which one is better?) so that the beam may not have travel too far in the atmosphere and lose it's intensity(is this a concern?). And there are also some concerns of people being exposed to high intensity microwaves if the receiving site is on the ground.
Can the energy be stored in some kind of supercapacitors attached to the balloons ,i know supercapacitors don't really hold on to the energy for long ,is there any other way to store the energy for a long time? so that the energy stored can be harvested once in few years or something?

Or is it economical to have the receiving base in places where population is very scarce?
Like some uninhabited islands or polar regions?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Are you asking literally just to create power for the surface? It costs like $10k/pound to put something in orbit. You could probably power a small town for the cost of putting enough panels in orbit to power a few houses.
 
Pengwuino said:
Are you asking literally just to create power for the surface? It costs like $10k/pound to put something in orbit. You could probably power a small town for the cost of putting enough panels in orbit to power a few houses.

this is actually a quite old topic .

Space based solar power

i was thinking of some possible solutions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K