Thesis Title - Space Based Solar Power (recommendations)

In summary, there is a discussion about finding a suitable title for a thesis on Space Based Solar Power, specifically focusing on a hybrid-relay laser-HVDC cable concept. Suggestions for titles include "A Method of Orbital-to-Ground Power Transmission" and "Space Based Solar Power: A Method of Orbital-to-Ground Power Transmission." There is also a discussion about the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed concept, including concerns about reliability, maintenance, and potential attacks.
  • #1
22
0
Hello.

Here is my executive summary. Anyhave have recommendations for the titles. Originally it is "Space Based Solar Power: A System Review". It's short, snappy, but it doesn't quite portray my thesis and I am specifically looking at one type of SBSP system. But it is unconventional, so there it no name for it. In my thesis I call it "hybrid-relay laser-HVDC cable concept". But it sounds very unprofessional especially for a title.

So yeah any short titles, which portray my thesis a little better, since I am looking at a specific concept more than general concepts.

If no one can up with a reasonable title no worries, I will just keep the current one, as I have until Monday afternoon to submit, so over the weekend just cleaning up the English, and adding finishing touches etc.

Image:
2dr9nux.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How about "A Method of Orbital-to-Ground Power Transmission" ?
 
  • #3
If your focus lies on the transmission (I would expect that), the title can highlight that as well, "A Method of Orbital-to-Ground Power Transmission" sounds good.

Out of curiosity: How does your system get a better overall efficiency than the best current solar cells on earth?
"not a feasible concept" - even with the low launch costs estimated for some megastructures like space elevators or the StarTram concept?
 
  • #4
Interesting ideas. How about: Beam it Down Scotty: Solving the Transmission Problem for Space Based Solar Power.

You are going to have serious problems getting a cable from the upper atmosphere to the Earth surface, not to mention problems with airplanes running into it. Why not have the orbiting solar panels placed in geostationary orbit over the Sahara desert which is almost always cloud free, I think. You could have multiple receiving sites on Earth so you could switch to another when the Sahara was cloudy. Not all would be covered by cloud at the same time. These sites would be tied into a grid.

What would happen if an airplane moved through the beam?

AM
 
  • #5
The beam is a narrow line in the atmosphere, you can easily avoid it with airplanes. With the proposed cables, you have to avoid the cables - similar thing, just a bit easier as you can attach flashing lights to them.
 
  • #6
@Andrew Mason - Haha, the star trek reference, is great but I don't think my supervisor will like it.
@jambaugh @mjg Your title "A Method of Orbital/al-to-Ground Power Transmission" does indeed sound very good. The word "orbital" is catchy.

Though I'm aiming to keep the "Space Based Solar Power:" part, as it indicates what the entire thesis is about.

Space Based Solar Power: A Method of Orbital-to-Ground Power Transmission

That does sound splendid.

@mfb Well some technologies have not matured yet, but they have still been utilized as SBSP can't be implemented this year, or the next, if planning were to start within the next year or two, it would still take a minimum of 5-10 years before things are up and running. Hence I consider solar pumped semiconductor efficiencies to reach 73% efficiency by then, along with quantum dot solar cells to also reach 73% (reference'd of course from other authors, and their practical possibilities).

@Andrew If SBSP ever came about, a no-fly zone would be the least of the worries to prevent aeroplanes from passing through. The point of this concept is so it can be used near population, as the lower portion of atmospheric transmission is not done wirelesly, hence less "human fear" factor, and less policies and such to deal with. Again due to the aerostat collecting the beam, clouds no longer matter either, so the advantage of being close to population is greater than transmitting from the Sahara desert.

But it is true, a limitation of the study is no experiments have been down with km length high voltage DC cables transmitting electricity through the atmosphere, most likely corona effects will be more severe ionizing the surrounding air. Again 10 years, may bring about carbon-nano tubes, which makes it possible.
 
  • #7
astralfx said:
@mfb Well some technologies have not matured yet, but they have still been utilized as SBSP can't be implemented this year, or the next, if planning were to start within the next year or two, it would still take a minimum of 5-10 years before things are up and running. Hence I consider solar pumped semiconductor efficiencies to reach 73% efficiency by then, along with quantum dot solar cells to also reach 73% (reference'd of course from other authors, and their practical possibilities).

@Andrew If SBSP ever came about, a no-fly zone would be the least of the worries to prevent aeroplanes from passing through. The point of this concept is so it can be used near population, as the lower portion of atmospheric transmission is not done wirelesly, hence less "human fear" factor, and less policies and such to deal with. Again due to the aerostat collecting the beam, clouds no longer matter either, so the advantage of being close to population is greater than transmitting from the Sahara desert.

But it is true, a limitation of the study is no experiments have been down with km length high voltage DC cables transmitting electricity through the atmosphere, most likely corona effects will be more severe ionizing the surrounding air. Again 10 years, may bring about carbon-nano tubes, which makes it possible.
Even if it was possible to put a tower up above all the clouds, you would have to figure a way of getting extremely high voltage out of the laser energy. I can't imagine putting huge transformers at the top of that 5 mile high tower. You would need high voltage to reduce the cable mass. How are you getting high voltage up there?

There would also be significant reliability issues relating to service/maintenance, huge downtime problem if the receiver, cable or tower fails. (It would also be vulnerable to attacks).

The surface area of this solar cell array would have to be pretty large. The US needs about 500 GW of electrical power or 5 x 10^8 kW. The solar radiation in space will be about 1.350 kW/m^2. So you will need about 4 x 10^8 m^2 of solar panels operating at 100% efficiency. If you able to transfer as much as 20% of that to the Earth as electrical power, you would need 2 x 10^9 m^2 of panels ie. about 45 km x 45 km. And that is just for the US. That is not that much for the surface of the Earth (you would need about 10x more on Earth due to clouds, night-time and latitude) but in space? I think this is more than 10 years away.

AM
 

1. What is Space Based Solar Power (SBSP)?

Space Based Solar Power (SBSP) is a concept that involves capturing solar energy in space and transmitting it to Earth for use as a renewable energy source. This is done using large solar arrays placed in geosynchronous orbit around the Earth.

2. What are the potential benefits of SBSP?

The potential benefits of SBSP include a constant and reliable source of renewable energy, reduction of carbon emissions, and increased energy independence for countries. It also eliminates the need for land-based solar panels and reduces the impact on the environment.

3. What are the main challenges of implementing SBSP?

The main challenges of implementing SBSP include the high cost of launching and building the necessary infrastructure in space, as well as the technical difficulties of transmitting the energy back to Earth. There are also concerns about the potential impact on the space environment and the risk of space debris.

4. How feasible is SBSP with current technology?

While the concept of SBSP is technically feasible, it is not currently economically viable. The cost of launching and building the necessary infrastructure is still too high, and there are also technical challenges that need to be addressed. However, with advancements in technology and potential government support, it could become a viable option in the future.

5. What are some recommendations for further research on SBSP?

Further research on SBSP should focus on improving the efficiency and reliability of the technology, as well as finding more cost-effective ways to build and launch the necessary infrastructure. It is also important to address any potential environmental and safety concerns before implementing SBSP on a large scale.

Suggested for: Thesis Title - Space Based Solar Power (recommendations)

Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
888
Replies
2
Views
645
Back
Top