What Are the Methods to Determine Surface Normal Direction at a Point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physiker99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal Surface
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the surface normal direction at a specific point for the equations r²=9 and x+y+z²=1. It clarifies that these surfaces are not planes; r²=9 represents a spherical shell, while x+y+z²=1 is a paraboloid. To find the normal direction, one must define the function F(x,y,z) that represents the surface, compute the gradient ∇F, and evaluate it at the given point (2,-2,1). This method is essential for understanding surface normals in three-dimensional geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of implicit surface representation in 3D geometry
  • Knowledge of gradient calculation in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with spherical and paraboloid equations
  • Basic concepts of level sets in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the calculation of gradients for implicit functions in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about surface normals in different coordinate systems
  • Explore applications of surface normals in computer graphics and physics
  • Review the properties of spherical and paraboloid surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, computer graphics, and engineering who need to understand surface normal calculations for various geometric shapes.

physiker99
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
How do I find "surface normal direction" for a plane on a point with coordinates specified?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a plane equation or do you only have the coordinates of a point? Please be more specific.
 
i need to find normal directions for r^2=9 and x+y+z^2=1 at the point (2,-2,1)
 
physiker99 said:
i need to find normal directions for r^2=9 and x+y+z^2=1 at the point (2,-2,1)

First, neither of those surfaces are planes. The first is a spherical shell, and the second is a paraboloid.

Second, straight from wikipedia:

[PLAIN]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_normal said:
If[/PLAIN] a surface S is given implicitly as the set of points (x,y,z) satisfying F(x,y,z)=0, then, a normal at a point (x,y,z) on the surface is given by the gradient:

\mathbf{N}=\mathbf{\nabla}F

since the gradient at any point is perpendicular to the level set, and F(x,y,z) = 0 (the surface) is a level set of F.

I'd be shocked if this wasn't in your notes or textbook, and I strongly suggest you review the section of your text that covers this.

Anyways, just like wikipedia implies, to find a surface normal at a point, define F, take the gradient (in the appropriate coordinate system) and plug in the point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K