What Are the Miller Indices for the Bragg Reflections?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cepheid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bragg Reflection
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the lattice parameter and Miller indices for Bragg reflections using the Debye-Scherrer technique with Cu Kα radiation. The Bragg angles provided are 10.83, 15.39, 18.99, 22.07, and 24.84 degrees, with a wavelength of 1.542 Å. Key equations include the Bragg condition for diffraction, 2d sin θ = nλ, and the spacing formula for cubic lattices, d = a[h2 + k2 + l2]-1/2. The discussion reveals confusion regarding the relationship between the angles and the corresponding Miller indices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Debye-Scherrer technique for X-ray diffraction
  • Familiarity with Bragg's law and its application in crystallography
  • Knowledge of Miller indices and their significance in crystallography
  • Basic concepts of cubic lattice structures and unit cell dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Debye-Scherrer technique in detail to understand its application in X-ray diffraction
  • Learn how to calculate Miller indices from diffraction data
  • Explore the relationship between Bragg angles and atomic planes in cubic lattices
  • Investigate the significance of lattice parameters in crystallography and material science
USEFUL FOR

Students in materials science, physicists studying crystallography, and anyone involved in X-ray diffraction analysis will benefit from this discussion.

cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,197
Reaction score
38

Homework Statement



An alkali halide is studied with the Debye-Scherrer technique and Cu K_{\alpha} radiation. The Bragg angles for the first five lines (in degrees) are 10.83, 15.39, 18.99, 22.07, and 24.84. Calculate

(a) The lattice parameter
(b) The Miller indices for the planes producing the mentioned diffraction beams
(c) The Miller index for the line(s) producing the largest allowable Bragg angle.

Added in by the prof as an afterthought:

\textrm{Take} \ \ \lambda[\textrm{Cu} \ K_{\alpha}] = 1.542 \ \ \textrm{\AA}

Homework Equations



As far as I can tell they are:

The Bragg condition for diffraction:

2d \sin \theta = n \lambda

A previously derived result that for a cubic lattice with lattice constant a, the spacing between successive (hkl) places is given by:

d = a[h^2 + k^2 + l^2]^{-\frac{1}{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm pretty lost here. Is the lattice parameter (cubic unit cell dimension) 'a' supposed to be arrived at somehow independently of the diffaction data?

The Debye-Scherrer technique was never discussed in class. I looked it up and discovered that rather than varying the angle of incidence of a single beam on the crystal face, the beam is shone at a sample of many ground up crystals of random orientations in order to cover all incidence angles simultaneously (or something like that!) This leads me to wonder how you can tell which line is due to which angle, but I'm not going to look into it further. I think the whole idea is that the specific experimental technique used to produce the data is not relevant to the problem, which is why the prof didn't have a problem introducing terminology he hadn't defined (although he doesn't have a problem doing that anyway! )

As for part b, the logical thing to do would seem to be to try and use the data to calculate n. But how is that done without knowing what d is? Which requires knowing a...

I don't even understand how x-ray diffraction works. Is each line associated with a different angle (one of the five given)? If so, does each line correspond to reflection off the *same* atomic plane, but just a different incidence angles? Or is each line produced by reflections from different planes with different Miller indices!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey everyone,

Don't worry about it. It's too late. The prof has handed out solutions though. I can post them here if anyone else is curious.

Thanks.
 
could you please post the solution!
Thanks
 
No, I can't, because this thread is three years old!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K