What are the probabilities involved with package shipping insurance?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kenny1999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Insurance Probabilities
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the probabilities associated with package shipping insurance, specifically examining whether purchasing insurance is financially sensible given the likelihood of package loss. Participants explore the relationship between insurance fees and the probability of loss, considering various scenarios and assumptions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the probability of losing a package and whether it is higher than the insurance fee of 0.5%.
  • Another participant suggests that if 200 customers pay 0.5%, the company could cover one lost package, implying a loss rate of 1 in 200.
  • It is proposed that if the replacement cost is only a fraction of the package value, the insurance fee might cover a higher loss rate, such as 1 in 100 shipments.
  • A participant raises the question of whether it is better not to purchase insurance if shipping frequently, suggesting that the expected loss might be less than the total insurance fees paid.
  • Another participant states that insuring against small losses may not be cost-effective in general.
  • A personal account is shared, noting that a participant has shipped over 1,000 boxes without insurance and has not experienced any losses, questioning the necessity of insurance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and effectiveness of purchasing shipping insurance, with no consensus reached on whether it is advisable to insure packages or not.

Contextual Notes

Participants make various assumptions regarding loss rates and replacement costs, which may affect their conclusions about the value of insurance. The discussion does not resolve these assumptions or their implications.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering shipping packages, especially those weighing the costs and benefits of purchasing insurance for their shipments.

kenny1999
Messages
235
Reaction score
5
The situation is, I purchase an insurance for loss of a package during shipment, the insurance fee is 0.5% of the claimed actual value of the package, but this is optional, you don't need to purchase insurance but you will not get compensated if the package is lost.. Assume that the shipping company is not intended to earn money through the insurance, and they only use the insurance fee collected to pay for the loss of the package of other customers. What is the probability of losing a package? Is it also not higher than 0.5% ? Is it that simple?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kenny1999 said:
The situation is, I purchase an insurance for loss of a package during shipment, the insurance fee is 0.5% of the claimed actual value of the package, but this is optional, you don't need to purchase insurance but you will not get compensated if the package is lost.. Assume that the shipping company is not intended to earn money through the insurance, and they only use the insurance fee collected to pay for the loss of the package of other customers. What is the probability of losing a package? Is it also not higher than 0.5% ? Is it that simple?

Essentially, yes it's a simple equation. If they have 200 customers and each pay 0.5%, then the company gets enough in insurance to pay for one additional product. So, if 1 out of the 200 items goes missing, then the total insurance money collected pays for the replacement.

You could, of course, make other assumptions. Most obviously, the cost of replacement to the company is not the full price the customer pays. It may only be 50%, say. If you buy a product for $500, then it may only cost a company $250 to replace it.

In that case, the insurance fee of 0.5% would cover a loss of 1 out of every 100 shipments.
 
PeroK said:
Essentially, yes it's a simple equation. If they have 200 customers and each pay 0.5%, then the company gets enough in insurance to pay for one additional product. So, if 1 out of the 200 items goes missing, then the total insurance money collected pays for the replacement.

You could, of course, make other assumptions. Most obviously, the cost of replacement to the company is not the full price the customer pays. It may only be 50%, say. If you buy a product for $500, then it may only cost a company $250 to replace it.

In that case, the insurance fee of 0.5% would cover a loss of 1 out of every 100 shipments.

Hi, in real life every day situation, if I often ship package, is it better NOT to purchase such insurance
because the insurance fee I've paid will probably more than what I'll lose in a rare case that the package
gets lost? Like the expected value of casino?

And if I only ship package sometimes, not very often, then it's just a matter of probability and it really
shouldn't make much difference whether I purchase such insurance ?

Am I understanding correctly??
 
Whether you insure something is your decision. In general,insuring against small losses may not be cost effective.
 
I've shipped well over 1,000 boxes over the last 15 years (all via USPS). Never insured any, never had any lost. Had one arrive 28 days late due to Katrina but that was the worse case. Had I insured them I'd be out about $2,500
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 147 ·
5
Replies
147
Views
22K
Replies
3
Views
5K