What are the range of values of k for the equation (k+1)x^2+4kx+9=0?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gughanath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the range of values for k in the quadratic equation (k+1)x² + 4kx + 9 = 0 that results in no real roots. Participants clarify that this requires the discriminant to be negative, leading to the inequality 16k² - 36k - 36 < 0. The roots of the corresponding equation, found by setting the discriminant to zero, are k = 3 and k = -3/4. Consequently, the valid range for k is established as -3/4 < k < 3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadratic equations and their standard form.
  • Knowledge of the discriminant and its role in determining the nature of roots.
  • Ability to solve quadratic inequalities.
  • Familiarity with factoring polynomials.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the quadratic formula and its applications in solving equations.
  • Learn how to derive and interpret the discriminant for various quadratic equations.
  • Practice solving quadratic inequalities and determining valid ranges for variables.
  • Explore advanced topics in algebra, such as polynomial factorization techniques.
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and anyone involved in algebraic problem-solving, particularly those focusing on quadratic equations and inequalities.

Gughanath
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
what are the range of values of k that gives the equation (k+1)x^2+4kx+9=0 ...I work it out :confused: ...please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
I think you have omitted something from your text; what was that?
 
ups sorry...it should say at the end...that gives the equation no real roots
 
And what do you think that means?
 
Hi, you can use the quadratic formula to find the roots of your equation. Forcing no real roots is equivalent to forcing the discriminant (the part under the root sign) to be negative. This will give you conditions on k that you're looking for.

ps. you have to make a restriction on k to guarantee that your equation is a quadratic and not linear. what is this restriction?
 
i can't use the quadrativ formula for this euqation..when i work out the bracket i get
x^2+x^2k+4kx+9=0 ...i have no idea how to use the discrimant in this case..please help
 
Let a=k+1, b=4k, c=9.
Then your equation looks like
ax^2+bx+c=0
Can you solve that one?
 
i know that the discrimiant has to be smaller than 0...
 
And what is the discriminant, expressed with a,b and c?
 
  • #10
no i am still confused
 
  • #11
What is your problem?
 
  • #12
could you please just show me how i work out this questions?
 
  • #13
because then i will undertand
 
  • #14
I ask you again:
Given the equation:
ax^2+bx+c=0
What is the discriminant?
 
  • #15
16k^2-(4[k+1]*9)<0 that becomes 16k^2-36k-36<0
 
  • #16
Gughanath said:
16k^2-(4[k+1]*9)<0 that becomes 16k^2-36k-36<0

Good, now can you find the values of k that satisfy this new inequality?
 
  • #17
Very good!
Here's a hint:
In order to find the range of k-values your after,
1. find the zeros in your discriminant.
That is, solve the equation for k:
16k^{2}-36k-36=0
2. You weren't interested in the k-values for which the discriminant was zero, but the k-values for which the discriminant is less than zero.
But you should figure out for yourself that those values must lie between the two values found in 1.
 
  • #18
i see that i have to factoris ethe equation in the disriminant now..but i can't find the right numbers
 
  • #19
Gughanath said:
i see that i have to factoris ethe equation in the disriminant now..but i can't find the right numbers
Quite true!
Look at my previous post for hints.
 
  • #20
please...i have no idea how to continue...
 
  • #21
Well, what values of k solves:
16k^{2}-36k-36=0 ?

(Note: You were asked to find the values of k so that the discriminant is less than zero, not zero, but finding the zeroes is a good start)
 
  • #22
k..thanks for your help...
 
  • #23
Now, having found the k-values yielding zero discriminant, you should be able to write the discrimanant as:
16k^{2}-36k-36=16(k-3)(k+\frac{3}{4})
What must then the k-interval be which yields negative discriminant?
 
  • #24
how did u factorise that?
 
  • #25
It is the roots of equation gained by setting the discriminant equal to 0 (that is, -3/4 and 3 are the roots)
 
  • #26
ooo (: I am so...now i undertand it...the discriminant is 16k^2+36k-36..simplified it becomes 16[k^2 - (9/4)k - 9/4]...-3 and +3/4 multiplied give -9/4 and when added they also give -9/4...so these are these are the roots..factorised the equation becomes 16[(k-3)(k+3/4)]=0..the values of k here is 3 or -3/4...but the equation must be lower than 0 for 16[(k-3)(k+3/4)]<0 the range of the values of k are in -3/4<k<3...is that right?
 
  • #27
thanks a lot for your help everyone...sorry for bothering you..i was so busy yesterday my brain wasant running properly...lol
 
  • #28
You're right about the interval;I wouldn't agree to what you said about your brain, though..
 
  • #29
very good so any k that satisfies 16k^2-36k-36<0 is the k we are looking for ..
lets divide throughout by 4 to make the eqn simple
we get 4k^2-9k-9<0
i can write this as,
(4k+1)(k-3)<0

what does this imply?
(Note : if x*y < 0 it means multiplication of x and y must be negative)

-- AI
 
  • #30
damn ! i did not realize this thread had 2 pages!
umm please delete my current and last post as they are totally irrelevant now!

-- AI
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
783
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K