What are the strange absorption peaks on this solar spectrum?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BucketOfFish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectrum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the analysis of solar spectra, specifically the absorption peaks observed at 760.15 nm and 761.18 nm. Initially suspected to be a solar prominence, the peaks were later identified as telluric absorption features caused by atmospheric molecules, primarily water vapor. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper calibration and normalization of spectrographic data to accurately identify these features, with references to Fraunhofer lines and Wien's displacement law for further understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solar spectroscopy and absorption spectra
  • Familiarity with Fraunhofer lines and their significance
  • Knowledge of Wien's displacement law for peak energy calculations
  • Experience with spectrometer calibration and normalization techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of telluric absorption features on solar spectra analysis
  • Learn about the calibration methods for spectrometers
  • Study the application of Wien's displacement law in astrophysics
  • Explore the differences between O2 and H2O absorption lines in various celestial observations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysicists, and anyone involved in solar spectroscopy or atmospheric science will benefit from this discussion.

BucketOfFish
Messages
60
Reaction score
1
I was taking solar spectra yesterday for a Physics lab, and I found this strange phenomenon slightly to the left of the sun. I think it might be a solar prominence, but then again I know absolutely nothing about astronomy. What is it?

(The graph is intensity vs. wavelength)

http://www.imgur.com/FfZxd

EDIT: I can't get the image to show, but the link is http://imgur.com/FfZxd. The absorption peaks are at 760.15 nm and 761.18 nm.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
How far to the left are we talking about here? A few arcseconds?
 
here's the image for easy viewing :)

attachment.php?attachmentid=44253&stc=1&d=1329954922.png




Dave
 

Attachments

  • FfZxd.png
    FfZxd.png
    5.5 KB · Views: 631
Never mind, it turns out it's probably just the cheap spectrometer giving faulty readings. No strange solar phenomena today.
 
BucketOfFish said:
Never mind, it turns out it's probably just the cheap spectrometer giving faulty readings. No strange solar phenomena today.

No worries! Keep up the experiments!
 
The features seen at ~690, 720 and 760nm are due to absorption of the sunlight by molecules (water, I think) in the Earth's atmosphere. They are otherwise known as telluric absorption features.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraunhofer_lines

If the spectrographic data is properly normalized and calibrated (obviously it is not), then those would be O2 lines. Now, do you think that molecular oxygen might exist in a G-type star? If not, where might molecular oxygen exist between your telescope and the sun?

Also, looking at the data, I am not convinced the wavelengths are accurate. You should be able to calculate what the peak energy output from the sun is from Wein's displacement law. If the wavelengths are off, then that might be H2O instead of O2. Now, where could H2O exist? In the sun's atmosphere? Probably not.
 
vociferous said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraunhofer_lines

Also, looking at the data, I am not convinced the wavelengths are accurate. You should be able to calculate what the peak energy output from the sun is from Wein's displacement law. If the wavelengths are off, then that might be H2O instead of O2. Now, where could H2O exist? In the sun's atmosphere? Probably not.

I am not sure if these questions are directed at me, but I'll answer anyway. The wavelength calibration looks okay to me. The Calcium H & K lines appear to be located at their expected positions (393.4 and 396.9nm), as do the Sodium D line (~589nm) and the hydrogen alpha (656.3nm), to name just a few.

Also, the telluric features are labelled in the solar spectrum shown on that wiki page.
 
matt.o said:
I am not sure if these questions are directed at me, but I'll answer anyway. The wavelength calibration looks okay to me. The Calcium H & K lines appear to be located at their expected positions (393.4 and 396.9nm), as do the Sodium D line (~589nm) and the hydrogen alpha (656.3nm), to name just a few.

Also, the telluric features are labelled in the solar spectrum shown on that wiki page.

It was directed at the OP, but I just looked at some spectra of various objects I took last year and I guess I was misremembering the O2 lines being weaker than the H2O lines (except for Saturn, where H2O was almost as strong as O2, which may be partially due to extraterrestrial O2 combining with atmospheric O2).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K