What Caused the M 7.5 Earthquake in Central New Guinea?

  • Thread starter Thread starter davenn
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the M 7.5 earthquake that occurred in Central New Guinea, specifically examining its causes, the characteristics of the seismic event, and the subsequent aftershocks. The scope includes technical explanations of seismic activity, fault mechanics, and the geological context of the region.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports significant activity on their seismometer during the earthquake, indicating the event's intensity.
  • Another participant notes the occurrence of aftershocks, specifically mentioning a 6.0 and a 6.3 magnitude aftershock, and describes the pattern of these aftershocks as a bi-lateral rupture sequence along a fault line.
  • A participant discusses the geological context, identifying the event's location within the Highlands Fold and Thrust Belt and suggesting that the moment tensor data indicates thrust fault motion with a dip-slip to the northeast.
  • There is mention of the convergence rate in the area being around 50mm/year, which may relate to the tectonic activity causing the earthquake.
  • Further updates on aftershocks include a M5.8 and a M6.7, indicating ongoing seismic activity in the region.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to agree on the occurrence of significant aftershocks and the geological context of the earthquake. However, there is no explicit consensus on the detailed mechanisms or implications of the fault motions discussed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion relies on specific seismic data and interpretations of fault mechanics, which may depend on various assumptions about the geological structure and seismic behavior of the region. The exact nature of the faulting and its implications remain open to further exploration.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to seismologists, geologists, and those studying tectonic activity in the Pacific region, as well as individuals monitoring seismic events and their implications.

davenn
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
9,725
Reaction score
11,821
very large event had my seismometer hitting the stops for some time

zhi.gif


and the low gain channel so things could be seen more clearly

zlo1.gif
Location map with aftershocks

upload_2018-2-26_11-50-27.png
USGS Data for the event

M 7.5 - 89km SSW of Porgera, Papua New Guinea
Time: 2018-02-25 17:44:44 (UTC)
Location: 6.149°S 142.766°E
Depth: 35.0 km

Dave
 

Attachments

  • zhi.gif
    zhi.gif
    196.7 KB · Views: 1,115
  • zlo1.gif
    zlo1.gif
    150.9 KB · Views: 1,115
  • upload_2018-2-26_11-50-27.png
    upload_2018-2-26_11-50-27.png
    131.4 KB · Views: 1,130
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda, jim mcnamara and Drakkith
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Holy smokes!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
An update as the aftershocks continue to roll in the two largest ones have been a 6.0 and a 6.3
As can be seen on the updated even map below, the events stretch out in a line. With the main 7.5 shock located roughly in the middle of the events it shows a really nice bi-lateral rupture sequence ( where the fault ruptures in both directions along the fault line)

upload_2018-2-27_8-9-43.png


This line is the front of a large fold and thrust fault zone (Highlands Fold and Thrust Belt) along the southern edge of the mountains.

upload_2018-2-27_8-24-46.png
The moment tensor data clearly shows a thrust fault motion for this event
with the dip-slip to the north east and this agrees with the plate motion arrows in the previous map
The amount of plate motion is indicated by the length of those arrows and for the area of the quake, the convergence is around 50mm / year

upload_2018-2-27_8-28-3.png
Fault motions and "beach balls"
The 3rd one down relates to the thrust motion of this 7.5 quake
focalmechs.png

cheers
Dave
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-2-27_8-9-43.png
    upload_2018-2-27_8-9-43.png
    172.9 KB · Views: 640
  • upload_2018-2-27_8-24-46.png
    upload_2018-2-27_8-24-46.png
    88.6 KB · Views: 742
  • upload_2018-2-27_8-28-3.png
    upload_2018-2-27_8-28-3.png
    3.9 KB · Views: 625
  • focalmechs.png
    focalmechs.png
    23.4 KB · Views: 660
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Attachments

  • zhi.jpg
    zhi.jpg
    116.4 KB · Views: 560

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K