I What Causes Ambiguity in Wick Rotation for Time-Ordered Correlators?

Thread starter thatboi
Start date Nov 17, 2023
Tags

Quantum physics

Click For Summary

The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the Wick rotation for time-ordered correlators, particularly the distinction between cases when time is greater than or less than zero. The accepted answer in the referenced post highlights the role of the factor ##e^{\pm i\pi}##, which arises from the negative sign in front of ##t^{2}##. Participants express uncertainty about the source of ambiguity in the final results of the correlators. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the implications of time ordering in quantum field theory. Clarifying these points is essential for grasping the nuances of Wick rotation in this context.

Nov 17, 2023

thatboi

Hi all,
I am reading the following post: https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...o-time-ordered-correlator-in-real-time-how-do
and was confused regarding the portion in the accepted answer where they made a distinction for the ##t>0## and ##t<0## case. I believe the ##e^{\pm i\pi}## factor comes from the negative sign in front of ##t^{2}## but cannot understand why there is an ambiguity in the final result.

Thread 'Angular Momentum Vector and Its Magnitude'

For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

View full post »