What Causes Angular Acceleration and Torque in a Free Body Diagram?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dl447342
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pivot Torque
AI Thread Summary
Angular acceleration and torque in a free body diagram are influenced primarily by gravitational force acting on the center of mass, along with the normal force exerted by the pivot. The discussion emphasizes that if only gravitational force were present, the ruler would remain stationary, indicating the necessity of torque for rotation. Participants highlight the importance of using physics equations rather than intuition to analyze forces and torques acting on the ruler. The placement of the pivot above the weights is crucial for understanding the system's dynamics. Overall, the conversation revolves around clarifying the forces at play and their contributions to angular motion.
dl447342
Messages
28
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Find the angular and linear accelerations of the ruler in the diagram below.
Relevant Equations
Torque = moment of inertia * angular acceleration = lever arm of force * force magnitude.
angular acceleration.png
I think the angular acceleration is counterclockwise (and thus so is the torque) in the diagram, but what would a free body diagram look like? After the system is released from rest, isn't the only force the gravitational force about the center of mass? And if so, what's causing the angular acceleration and torque? The ends of the ruler?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When released, what forces act on the ruler and where?
What are their torques about mass centre?
 
haruspex said:
When released, what forces act on the ruler and where?
What are their torques about mass centre?
Thanks for offering that hint. I said gravitational force is one, and I think it acts about the center of mass. But what about the others? That's the whole point of asking my question.
 
dl447342 said:
But what about the others?
What are those other forces?
 
dl447342 said:
After the system is released from rest, isn't the only force the gravitational force about the center of mass?
If gravity were truly the only force acting on the ruler, it would be in free fall towards the center of the Earth, no?
 
Well of course there's the normal force exerted by the pivot, but what force creates the torque?
 
dl447342 said:
Well of course there's the normal force exerted by the pivot
Yes. Where is that force exerted?

dl447342 said:
but what force creates the torque?
You're assuming that there is a torque. What are you basing that on? You said in the OP that you "think" there is a torque; what makes you think that?
 
PeterDonis said:
Yes. Where is that force exerted?You're assuming that there is a torque. What are you basing that on? You said in the OP that you "think" there is a torque; what makes you think that?
I'm assuming there is a torque because that seems to be implied by the question. If there is no torque, then since the angular velocity was initially zero, it should remain that way; that is, the ruler should remain at rest and not rotate.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
You need to use physics and not psychology to answer physics questions.

If there are forces where do they come from?. Enumerate them, draw them, and solve for their value using Newton's laws (and the similar rotational versions).

Your physics sense is good I think. You need to use the equations to show the result unequivocally. You learn these equations so you can solve problems too complicated to solve by intuition. Psychology will not help for real world physics problems
 
Last edited:
  • #11
dl447342 said:
I'm assuming there is a torque because that seems to be implied by the question.
As @hutchphd has pointed out, this is a very bad way to try to answer physics questions.

dl447342 said:
If there is no torque, then since the angular velocity was initially zero, it should remain that way; that is, the ruler should remain at rest and not rotate.
Yes, that's correct. So is there a torque, or isn't there? Don't try to guess what you think whoever wrote the question is trying to imply. Just think about the physics. All of the necessary physics has already been stated in this thread.
 
Back
Top