Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I What causes Heisenberg's uncertainty principle?

  1. Sep 22, 2016 #1
    I know the equation which explains how it works, but why is it like that?

    The closest thing I can think as to why is because of the wave-particle duality of matter given by λ=h/mv, which also explains itself. But I don't know exactly why.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 22, 2016 #2

    blue_leaf77

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    It's because position and momentum operators do not commute. In general any two non-commuting operators will be connected by some uncertainty relation.
     
  4. Sep 22, 2016 #3
    Could you please explain/elaborate on that?
     
  5. Sep 22, 2016 #4

    vanhees71

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    2016 Award

  6. Sep 22, 2016 #5

    Nugatory

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That result falls out of the mathematical formalism. If a quantum system is in a state in which some observable has a definite value, then that state must be an eigenstate of that observable. Thus, if the system state is such that two different observables both have definite values, then the state must be an eigenstate of both observables. However, there is a basic theorem that says a state can be an eigenstate of two different observables only if they commute, so if the observables don't commute then there is no state in which they both have definite values.

    Of course this answer just begs the question, WHY does the universe behave according to this particular set of mathematical rules? Physics has no really satisfactory answer to that question. The universe behaves the way it does, and it's up to us to discover rules that describe that behavior.
     
  7. Sep 22, 2016 #6

    vanhees71

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    2016 Award

    Well, that's not entirely true. The correct statement is that, if two self-adjoint operators commute there's a common (generalized) orthogonal eigensystems of the operators. If the operators don't commute there may be special cases, where the operators have a common eigenvector. Example: Angular momentum components for ##l=0##: There's one state, which is eigenvector for all three components of angular momentum with eigenvalue 0.
     
  8. Sep 22, 2016 #7

    Nugatory

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Ah - yes, zero eigenvalues do allow for a number of interesting special cases.
     
  9. Sep 22, 2016 #8

    Orodruin

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    It is not only zero eigenvalue that matters. What matters is whether or not the operators have a common eigenvector. This is not necessarily related to the eigenvalue being zero.
     
  10. Sep 22, 2016 #9

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    What causes X = Why does X happen? Physics is rather limited when it comes to „why”, because this „why” is always a neverending chain.
     
  11. Sep 22, 2016 #10

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Another way to look at the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for position and momentum is to consider it as a consequence of the mathematics of adding together waves that have different wavelengths:

    https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3295464#post3295464

    https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2972106#post2972106

    Any wave function (not just quantum-mechanical ones) has a similar uncertainty principle. In general, it involves the wavenumber k, which in QM is related to the momentum p. Electrical engineers see this uncertainty principle in electronic signal processing. It's part of Fourier analysis.
     
  12. Sep 22, 2016 #11

    blue_leaf77

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Sorry for late reply, I was trying to find a lecture note that derives this but couldn't find it in time. As Nugatory said, Heisenberg uncertainty principle is a purely mathematical consequence of the formulation of QM we are using. The derivation can be found in here (section 2), in particular the end result looks like
    $$
    (\Delta A)^2 (\Delta B)^2 \geq \left( \langle\psi|\frac{1}{2i}[A,B]|\psi\rangle\right)^2
    $$
    If ##[A,B]=0## then the two observables would not obey the uncertainty principle.
     
  13. Sep 23, 2016 #12

    vanhees71

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    2016 Award

    As I said you find one proof also in my old posting

    https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ly-uncertainty-principle.811326/#post-5093474

    This proof even admits the derivation of the very states for which the equality sign holds, and these are the coherent and squeezed states (i.e., Gaussians).

    Of course the uncertainty principle also holds for ##[A,B]=0##. Only then it's not very exciting, because in this case it just states the obvious fact that the standard deviations of the two observables in any state are not negative :-).
     
  14. Sep 23, 2016 #13
    Heisenberg found that then he could use classical equations. At least that's what The Feynman Lectures says.
     
  15. Sep 24, 2016 #14

    Zafa Pi

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    It's called the spectral theorem, and the proof isn't particularly difficult.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted