What causes materials to become poisonous and combustive?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MaddenDude
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the factors that contribute to materials being classified as poisonous or combustive. Participants explore the molecular and chemical characteristics that influence toxicity and combustion rates, as well as the physical manifestations of chemical reactions when different materials are combined.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a substance is considered poisonous if it can seriously affect health or cause death, with examples like HCl being harmful if ingested.
  • Others argue that the combustibility of a substance depends on its chemical structure and the nature of its bonds, with examples like alkanes burning faster than alcohol.
  • A participant questions the specific molecular characteristics that make a substance poisonous, seeking a deeper understanding of atomic interactions.
  • It is suggested that both the atomic composition and molecular structure contribute to a substance's toxicity, with changes in structure potentially transforming harmless substances into harmful ones.
  • Combustion is noted to depend on factors such as oxidation state, bond angles, multiple bonds, and volatility, with specific examples provided to illustrate these points.
  • Some participants mention that poisons can interfere with biological reactions, with examples like nerve gases and benzene illustrating different mechanisms of toxicity.
  • There is a discussion about the physical conditions affecting combustion, including oxygen supply and temperature, and a suggestion to differentiate between combustion and explosions.
  • A participant expresses interest in practical applications of combustion, inspired by a media example, and shares thoughts on the use of nitrous oxide in rocket technology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding regarding the definitions of poisonous and combustive materials, with no consensus reached on the specifics of molecular interactions or the best methods for predicting chemical reactions.

Contextual Notes

Some claims made regarding the combustibility of materials and the nature of poisons depend on specific definitions and assumptions that may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion includes references to empirical observations and theoretical considerations without resolving the underlying complexities.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring chemistry, toxicology, or materials science, as well as those curious about the practical applications of combustion in technology.

MaddenDude
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
What makes something poisonous?

What makes thinks combust "readily" or quickly or slowly?

How do you know what the reaction will physically look like if you combine two meterials? Like Magnesium + water = a bright fire, etc.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
What we consider poisonous is something that if taken will seriously affect our health and possibly kill us. The chemical, however, is any chemical that is harmful to us. Let's say. we can consider HCl poisinous because it would probably kill us if we decided to drink it.

For combusting, it is the chemical that actually reacts with the oxygen that determines wether it will burn slowly or fast. For example, water is not a good combustible because the H2O molecule is made of H and O that are so tightly bonded that the hydrogen doesn't want to combust and the oxygen can't combust with itself.

Hope this helps.

Pierre.
 
Thanks, I understand the combustive part, but I still don't get exactly what makes a substance poisonous? I meant specifically at the molecular level, what is it about the substance's atoms/bonds that makes it poisonous?
 
It's really about what the atoms do or how they bond, but also the specific molecule or atom can be harmful to our health. If you have a harmless molecule, you can transform it into a harmful one by changing the molecular structure. Olive oil, for example, can become carcinegenic if cooked. So you see, there is a little of both, partly the atoms themselves are poisonous, and partly it is the way they bond as a molecule that makes them poisonous. The molecular structure is changed and the substance becomes harmful.
 
How do you know what the reaction will physically look like if you combine two meterials? Like Magnesium + water = a bright fire, etc.


Study, study, study...
 
Combustion depends on a lot of things. The main ones I can think of are:
1) oxidation state
For example, alkanes burn a lot faster than alcohol. There's probably an exception, but I don't know of any
2) bond angles
If the bonds are stressed, the compound is not stable. Something like octanitrocubane is very unstable because the bond angles are forced to be 90 when they should be something like 119.5
3) multiple bonds
Things with multiple bonds between carbons burn like crazy. Compare a bottle of propane (blue bottle) to a bottle of propadiene (yellow bottle "mps gas") and you'll see the difference.
4) volatility
Ether burns a lot faster than gasoline; volatility is one of those reasons.

btw, putting magnesium in water does nothing.



Poisons (and drugs) generally interfere with reactions that should happen in your body. For example, psilocin, the drug/poison in "magic mushrooms", is strikingly similar to serotonin, a neurotransmiter found in your brain. Substitute one for the other and suddenly things don't work too well anymore. It's like putting diesel in a car that uses gasoline.
 
Last edited:
Substances can be toxic to the human body for many reasons. Nerve gases work by messing with your neurons, causing rapid fire of neurotransmitters across a synapse. This causes muscle convolusions etc. Other reasons for toxicity can simply be because a compound is relatively unreactive in the human body. Benzene is known to cause cancer. Benzene is a pretty inert substance, your body has trouble trying to change it to something it can easily expel. This is also why heavy metals are also very toxic inside the human body. Poisons are bad because they inhibit reactions inside the body. Your best bet is probably to ask this question in biology, or wait for a biochemist, if you want more detail.
 
MaddenDude said:
What makes something poisonous?
What makes thinks combust "readily" or quickly or slowly?
How do you know what the reaction will physically look like if you combine two meterials? Like Magnesium + water = a bright fire, etc.

It has to do with the oxygen supply, temperature, and type of fuel. It may be that you're trying to differentiate between a combustion and an explosion here. Have you done any research on explosions and the physical chemistry basis?

You should refer to the biology forum for the "poisonous query."

Usually you can analyze the reaction from a rigorous quantum perspective to find all of the details, e.g. the color. Otherwise you can take into account the important physical parameters of the reaction, such as enthalpy, free energy, rate, that every empirical aspect can be explained theoretically.
 
Did my answers help? I'm just trying to be helpful, but I think these guys know a lot more than me.
 
  • #10
Yes, all the posts helped. Thank you everyone!

I'll research and read more about it and ask any specific questions I have.

I was wondering about the combustion thing because, after I saw the Myth Busters episode where they tried to make a rocket with civil war technology, I was inspired and want to make my own.(and obviously, not as big) I'm in the first stage..."the vision" Infact, I'm not that serious about it, its just a vision right now.
 
  • #11
MaddenDude said:
I was wondering about the combustion thing because, after I saw the Myth Busters episode where they tried to make a rocket with civil war technology, I was inspired and want to make my own.(and obviously, not as big) I'm in the first stage..."the vision" Infact, I'm not that serious about it, its just a vision right now.
I saw that episode, but I was puzzled why they didn't use oxygen as the oxidizer. Their excuse was that you can't make liquid oxygen. Be that as it may, you can sure compress the hell out of it. Oxygen tanks have over 2000 psi in them; that's something like 125 atmospheres. It also makes for much better burning than whatever it was they used, I think it was NO2.
 
  • #12
They used nitrous oxide (N20, laughing gas, NAS!) They're not allowed to tell us how, but I am sure anyone can just google it.

Man that be so cool to have, feeding it to little kids must be so much fun!
 
  • #13
MaddenDude said:
They used nitrous oxide (N20, laughing gas, NAS!) They're not allowed to tell us how, but I am sure anyone can just google it.
You don't need to make it, you just buy it at the store. It comes in cylinders used in cappuccino machines.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K