What causes radioactive decay?

Click For Summary
Radioactive decay occurs due to an unstable proton-neutron configuration in an atom's nucleus, but the exact trigger for decay at any given moment remains unknown. It is confirmed to be quantum mechanical in nature, with decay described as a spontaneous process not influenced by external factors. The consistency of half-lives is attributed to the constant probability of decay occurring over time, which aligns with the law of large numbers. Quantum tunneling plays a role in the decay process, where the timing of particle emission cannot be precisely predicted. Overall, the mechanisms behind decay involve complex interactions of fundamental forces, but the randomness of the process prevents precise timing predictions.
JDude13
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
So... I know that decay occurs when the nucleus of an atom has an unstable proton-neutron configuration.
My question is, at the instant that decay occurs, what triggers it? Is it quantum mechanical in nature? If so, why are half lives so consistent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JDude13 said:
at the instant that decay occurs, what triggers it?

We don't know.

Is it quantum mechanical in nature?

Yes.

If so, why are half lives so consistent?

For a particular decay process in a particular isotope, the probability of a decay occurring in the next time interval is a constant. For example, say a nucleus of a particular isotope has a 10% probability of decaying in the next minute via beta decay. If it survives for one minute, it now has a probability of 10% of surviving for the next minute. And so on. No matter how long it survives, the probability of it decaying in the next minute is still 10%. We can use this property to derive the exponential decay law and the half-life.
 
jtbell:

I think I heard somewhere (which makes me very uncomfortable with placing any value in it) that the uncertainty principle has a role in this. Is it that there is a finite possibility that the emitted particle be far enough from the nucleus that the net forces acting on it propel it away?

Thanks for considering what might be an uninformed question. I take some consolation in Eleanor Ducksworth defining learning as a process of making increasingly subtle mistakes.
 
The quantum field theoretical explanation for the radioactive decay of nuclei are the strong and electro-weak forces which are responsible for alpha decay and beta-decay, respectively.

In all cases there is no reason why THIS nucleus decays NOW.

Look at qm tunneling through a potential barrier: you can only talk about the tunneling amplitude or probability, not about the time WHEN a certain particle will tunnel through the barrier.
 
JDude13 said:
So... I know that decay occurs when the nucleus of an atom has an unstable proton-neutron configuration.
My question is, at the instant that decay occurs, what triggers it? Is it quantum mechanical in nature? If so, why are half lives so consistent?
We call decay spontaneous because it is not triggered by anything we know of.

The reliability of measurements of the half-life comes from the law of large numbers.
 
I know what causes radioactive decay. And I REALLY understand quantum actions.
 
Actually an unstable nucleus is constantly rearranging itself.since we cannot observe what goes on in the nucleus,decay is a random process.To answer your question more exactly,the cause of decay at that instant depends on the type of decay.in alpha decay the nucleons get arranged in such a way that the repulsion is high on particular protons.
its is of course quantum mechanical in nature.half lives are consistent because of the law of large numbers.Consider a single die.u roll it many times and the average will approach (1+2+3+4+5+6).the same case applies to the calculation and consistency of half lives.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K