What Causes Voids in the Expanding Universe?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter linda123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Empty Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of voids in the expanding universe, exploring theories and hypotheses regarding their formation and characteristics. Participants examine the implications of these voids in the context of cosmology, gravitational dynamics, and the distribution of matter in the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that voids may result from gravitational dynamics, where matter clumps together, leaving regions of lower density.
  • Others propose that the initial conditions of the Big Bang may not have been uniformly distributed, leading to areas of emptiness.
  • A viewpoint is presented that what appears to be empty space might contain unseen matter, such as dark matter, which could influence the distribution of galaxies.
  • One participant notes that voids can still contain galaxies and other matter, but at a lower density compared to the universal mean.
  • There is a discussion about the size of a specific void and its implications for understanding the universe's expansion over time.
  • Concerns are raised about estimating the current size of voids based on past observations and the effects of gravitational collapse.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various theories regarding the causes of voids, with no consensus reached on a single explanation. Multiple competing views remain regarding the nature and implications of these voids.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific definitions of voids and the assumptions about the distribution of matter in the universe. The discussion includes unresolved aspects related to the estimation of void sizes and the influence of gravitational dynamics.

linda123
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I know that astronomers have found things like this before, but to find an empty part of space this big really makes you wonder... My question to you all is, what are your theories on why there is emptiness in certain parts of space?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Since space has 'stuff' randomly scatter through it - empty generally means something has moved through a volume and swept up anything there.
Could be a galaxy or a cluster of galaxies formed and moved through the volume collecting up any material.

Larger areas may have more cosmological explanation - whatever originally caused matter to clump together into galaxies would equally have left emptye volumes where that matter came from.
 
I've read that galaxies like to gather in sheets or clusters. I would say it's empty there because there's gravity from the neighborhood of galaxies next to the empty space. Maybe the big bang wasnt perfectly distributed in all directions. It missed a few spots.
 
Let's not forget that what appears to be empty might in fact be teeming with things we simply can't see. Perhaps it's so full of the invisible stuff there isn't any room for Galaxies (although I reeeaaaalllllllyyy doubt that), such as dark matter.

One can tell by the way that matter appears in clumps such as Galaxies that the big bang didn't offer an even spread of all the matter, so I guess a huge void isn't out of the question or anything.
 
linda123 said:
I know that astronomers have found things like this before, but to find an empty part of space this big really makes you wonder... My question to you all is, what are your theories on why there is emptiness in certain parts of space?

It depends on what you mean. If you're referring to "voids", then the emptiness refers to a relative lack of matter compared to the universal mean on ~1-100 Mpc scales. However, voids, can still have galaxies, dark matter, gas...almost anything that can be found in clusters, it's just more sparsely distributed.

The origin of these voids is related to the way in which matter undergoes gravitational collapse as the universe expands. The fluctuations put in place early on tend to grow with time and overdense regions tend to attract matter from underdense regions, emptying them out. By the present day, you get a cellular structure, with walls and filaments sitting at the edges of massive voids.
 
Nice post, Nick
glad to see you back around more.
Last few months were finishing up thesis time, I gather.
Hope everything went well and it's on to postdoc.
 
Last edited:
I did some research and them some math, and I figured that this void is about twice the size of the next largest one known. (there are several other threads on this, and my reasoning is in noe of them, somewhere)
Burning-thunder said:
Let's not forget that what appears to be empty might in fact be teeming with things we simply can't see. Perhaps it's so full of the invisible stuff there isn't any room for Galaxies (although I reeeaaaalllllllyyy doubt that), such as dark matter.

One can tell by the way that matter appears in clumps such as Galaxies that the big bang didn't offer an even spread of all the matter, so I guess a huge void isn't out of the question or anything.
I read that this area is thought to be fairly devoid of dark matter, based on the behavior of objects around or nearby.
It also strikes me that the void is 6-8 billion ly away, meaning that we are seeing it as it existed six or eight billion years ago, when the universe had not expanded nearly as far as it has today. It's one thing to find such a very large void, but to find it in such a very small universe only compounds the wonder!
 
I was thinking the same thing. If it was 1 Gly across 6-8 Glys ago, what would be its size today given the expansion rate?
 
A volume 6-8 GLy ago was at z = 0.6-1.1 and thus 1.6-2.1 times smaller than today, if we only take into account expansion. However, voids expand not only due to expansion of space but also due to gravitational collapse of matter between them. I don't know how to estimate this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K