What Chemical Properties Affect Young's Modulus?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the chemical properties that influence Young's Modulus, particularly comparing linear polyethylene and silicone (VMQ). It concludes that intermolecular forces, such as London Dispersion Forces (LDFs), play a crucial role in determining the rigidity of materials. The Lennard-Jones function is highlighted as a useful tool for approximating potential energy in crystalline materials, while microstructural features significantly affect polymers. The contrasting behaviors of poly(cis-isoprene) and poly(trans-isoprene) illustrate how similar chemical compositions can lead to vastly different Young's Modulus values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Young's Modulus and its significance in materials science
  • Familiarity with intermolecular forces, particularly London Dispersion Forces (LDFs)
  • Knowledge of the Lennard-Jones potential and its application in material properties
  • Basic concepts of polymer chemistry and microstructural features
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of intermolecular forces on polymer properties
  • Study the Lennard-Jones function and its applications in calculating material properties
  • Explore the differences between elastomers and rigid polymers
  • Investigate the microstructural influences on the mechanical properties of polymers
USEFUL FOR

Materials scientists, polymer chemists, and engineers interested in the mechanical properties of materials, particularly those studying Young's Modulus and its influencing factors.

jkmiller
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Which chemical properties effect the physical property Young's Modulus? I know the answer is not as simple as intermolecular force
I can't seem to figure out which chemical properties govern the physical property that is young's modulus. For example, any linear (or with a low degree of branching) polyethylene with no crosslinking is still a somewhat rigid and solid substance (higher ym), whereas the most linear possible silicone with lots of crosslinking (VMQ) is super rubbery in the same temperature range (really really low ym) .

At their core, silicone and hydrocarbon plastics are chemically different on so many levels, but which differences are the ones that determine the modulus? I would assume it would be intermolecular force (so LDFs for both unless silicone can create temporary dipoles in that case I would predict them to be less fluid), which would make sense that silicones were more fluid because they are less linear, but there are plastics a whole lot less linear than VMQ that are way more rigid.

Help me physics friends I am but a lowly biochemist very lost in the realm of materials physics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Engineering news on Phys.org
Silicone is kind of like an elastomer, right?
 
Fundamentally, Young's Modulus is largely determined by intermolecular forces. At equilibrium, atoms sit (or, more correctly vibrate around) a point a certain distance from their nearest neighbours at which potential energy is minimised. You can think of it as sitting at the bottom of an energy well. Young's Modulus represents the force required to increase that distance from the unstressed equilibrium value.

In a simple, crystalline material, the Lennard-Jones function gives a pretty good approximation of potential energy versus interatomic distance, so you can do an order of magnitude calculation for Young's Modulus from just the binding energy.

With polymers, the potential energy curve is affected by microstructural features that need not be chemical in nature. For example, long linear molecules can be folded back on one another, so different atoms can be influenced by a varying number of near neighbours.

Perhaps the most dramatic example is the rubber-like elasticity of poly(cis-isoprene), in which rotation of carbon-carbon bonds allows the molecule to "unwind" under tension. By contrast, poly(trans-isoprene) is a stiff, relatively hard polymer going under the name of gutta-percha. It is the same chemistry, but completely different Young's Modulus
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
20K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
64K