MHB What Determines the Degree and Coefficients of Polynomials?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the degree and coefficients of polynomials, specifically addressing the numbers 4 and 0. The number 4 is identified as a polynomial with a degree of 0 and a nonzero coefficient of 4. In contrast, the number 0 is also classified as a polynomial, but its degree is considered undefined due to the absence of nonzero terms. The conversation emphasizes that a polynomial must consist of constants and variables with non-negative integer exponents, and highlights the distinction between dividing by a constant versus a variable. Overall, both 4 and 0 qualify as polynomials under these definitions.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Specify the degree and the (nonzero) coefficients of each polynomial.

(A) 4

(B) 0

Solution:

The number 4 can be expressed as 4x^0. Is this correct?
If this is right, then the nonzero coefficient must be 4 itself. Is this right? The degree is 0.

The whole number 0 can be expressed as 0x^0. The degree is 0. What is the nonzero coefficient of 0?

Why is 4 a polynomial?

Why is 0 a polynomial?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
(A) The degree of a constant is always 0. Any constant c can be written as cx^0.
(B) The degree of 0 is technically undefined. This is a polynomial but has no nonzero terms (obviously) and therefore has no degree.

These are certainly polynomials! More specifically, monomials, meaning they only have one term. A polynomial is a collection of constants and variables with exponents, but you cannot divide by a variable. Both 4 and 0 are then polynomials, because they do not break this rule.
 
joypav said:
(A) The degree of a constant is always 0. Any constant c can be written as cx^0.
(B) The degree of 0 is technically undefined. This is a polynomial but has no nonzero terms (obviously) and therefore has no degree.

These are certainly polynomials! More specifically, monomials, meaning they only have one term. A polynomial is a collection of constants and variables with exponents, but you cannot divide by a variable. Both 4 and 0 are then polynomials, because they do not break this rule.

You said that we cannot divide a variable. Say, for example, x. Is x/2 not considered x divided by 2?
 
RTCNTC said:
You said that we cannot divide a variable. Say, for example, x. Is x/2 not considered x divided by 2?

Not quite, if I understand what you're asking.

x/2 would be a polynomial. In this case, x is in the numerator. You CAN divide a variable by a constant. That is not an issue.

What I meant was, you CANNOT divide by a variable. Meaning, 2/x would not be a monomial. In this case, you have a variable in the denominator.
 
joypav said:
Not quite, if I understand what you're asking.

x/2 would be a polynomial. In this case, x is in the numerator. You CAN divide a variable by a constant. That is not an issue.

What I meant was, you CANNOT divide by a variable. Meaning, 2/x would not be a monomial. In this case, you have a variable in the denominator.

I get it now.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top