What do we mean when we say on shell particles?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ylem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Particles Shell
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the concepts of "on-shell" and "off-shell" particles in the context of relativistic physics. On-shell particles satisfy the equations of motion, specifically the energy-mass relation E² = p² + m², indicating they are real and physical. Off-shell particles, on the other hand, do not adhere to this relationship and are considered virtual, appearing only in mathematical calculations. The discussion also highlights the relevance of Noether's theorem, which connects conserved quantities to symmetries, applicable only to on-shell conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic physics principles
  • Familiarity with the energy-mass relation E² = p² + m²
  • Basic knowledge of Noether's theorem
  • Introduction to Quantum Field Theory and Feynman diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Noether's theorem in particle physics
  • Learn about the role of virtual particles in Quantum Field Theory
  • Explore Feynman diagrams and their applications in particle interactions
  • Investigate energy and momentum conservation in particle collisions
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in particle physics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of quantum mechanics and field theory.

ylem
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
What do we mean when we say "on shell" particles?

Hello!

What do we mean when we say a particle in on shell? What is off shell? I gather it is related to energy and momentum conservation to say if a process is possible, but I've no idea what it actually is. Is it something to do with writing E^2 = p^2 + m^2?

Cheers,

Samantha
 
Physics news on Phys.org


By on-shell one means "satisfying the equations of motion". For relativistic particles this indeed includes the property that the particle satisfies the energy-mass relation: E^2 = p^2 + m^2.

But it's a broader concept than that. For instance, Noether's theorem links conserved quantities to symmetries of the system. But this theorem only holds on-shell.
 


xepma said:
By on-shell one means "satisfying the equations of motion". For relativistic particles this indeed includes the property that the particle satisfies the energy-mass relation: E^2 = p^2 + m^2.

But it's a broader concept than that. For instance, Noether's theorem links conserved quantities to symmetries of the system. But this theorem only holds on-shell.

When one makes calculations of scattering initially and finally free particles, there involved solutions of the "free" equations of motion. In these solutions the energy is determined with the particle momentum. They say such particles are "on shell", meaning E(p) equation is a constraint to four-vector p. The Noether's theorem gives conserved values if they are expressed via solutions rather than via unknown variables.

If one makes calculations with help of Fourier representation, they are expressed via Fourier variables denoted historically also as p (also four variables used in the Fourier integrals). As soon as these variables are independent of each other, they are not bound by any relationship, so the combination E(p) takes non-physical values (E(p) is just meaningless). They say "off shell" or virtual particles. So any actual calculation includes on- and off-shell "particles".

Bob.
 
Last edited:
ylem said:
Hello!

What do we mean when we say a particle in on shell? What is off shell? I gather it is related to energy and momentum conservation to say if a process is possible, but I've no idea what it actually is. Is it something to do with writing E^2 = p^2 + m^2?

Cheers,

Samantha

Hello Samantha! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

On shell means real (physical), and is E2 = p2 + m2.

Off shell means not real (not physical), and is only used in the maths.

Off shell occurs only in the middle of calculations, never at the beginning or end.

Energy and momentum conservation applies to both on shell and off shell equations (but E2 = p2 + m2, which applies to each particle individually, does not apply off shell).

Unless you're doing Feynman diagrams and the Dyson expansion (a math technique in Quantum Field heory), you won't come across off shell. :wink:
 


Thank you all very much for your help. :-) However, how could I tell if a process is possible for on-shell particles? So... picking a simple process a photon annihilating to give an electron and positron. How can I determine if this is possible for on-shell particles?

Cheers, Samantha
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K