Relation between momentum and mass of quarks

  1. We say on-shell and off-shell mass of quarks. 1) What is the difference on-shell and off-shell mass of quarks. 2) At lab. center of mass frame for lepton particles p2= -m2. Can we apply this equation for quarks.
    Thank you!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. tiny-tim

    tiny-tim 26,055
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hi Hluf! :smile:
    a quark always has on-shell mass (usually just called "mass")

    a quark never has off-shell mass

    off-shell mass is a mathematical trick which helps in the calculations for Feynman diagrams
    (p is the four-momentum)

    yes this applies to everything (and in any frame): leptons hadrons and photons

    you can regard it as the definition of m (the mass) :wink:
     
  4. Bill_K

    Bill_K 4,160
    Science Advisor

    If it works once, it's a trick. If it works twice, it's a method!
     
    1 person likes this.
  5. tiny-tim

    tiny-tim 26,055
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    But if you don't know how it works, it's magic! o:)
     
  6. Meir Achuz

    Meir Achuz 2,056
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    If you don't know how it works, go to school to learn how.
    Quarks can appear as intermediate particles in Feynman diagrams, where they are
    'off-shell'.
     
  7. mfb

    Staff: Mentor

    Well, there is no center of mass frame for (single) photons.
     
  8. Some people would argue the complete opposite. The longer time a particle lives for, the more probably that its mass would be measured to be almost exactly the on-shell mass, but really the whole universe is quantum mechanical and every process a "little bit" virtual, so everything is always off-shell, the exact on-shell mass occupying measure zero of the probability distribution :p.
     
  9. Vanadium 50

    Vanadium 50 17,341
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Yes, some people will make this argument. Some people find quibbling entertaining. It's not a very good argument for promoting understanding of QFT to people new to it, though.

    There really is a difference between real and virtual, and to quote Potter Stewart, "I know it when I see it"
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

0
Draft saved Draft deleted