What do you think the differences between these scientists were?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hankeyb
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences between the scientific contributions of Copernicus, Einstein, Galileo, Newton, and Aristotle in the field of physics. Key distinctions include Aristotle's early formulation of mechanics, which lacked mathematical rigor and was based on observational phenomenology. The conversation highlights the evolution of scientific thought, emphasizing that earlier philosophers did not employ mathematics as rigorously as later scientists. The thread concludes that the topic is too broad for a comprehensive answer in a forum format.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the historical context of scientific development
  • Knowledge of key figures in physics and their contributions
  • Basic comprehension of the evolution of scientific methodology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Aristotle's contributions to mechanics and philosophy
  • Study the mathematical advancements introduced by Galileo and Newton
  • Explore the impact of Copernicus's heliocentric model on modern astronomy
  • Examine Einstein's theories and their relationship to classical physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, historians of science, and anyone interested in the evolution of scientific thought and methodology will benefit from this discussion.

hankeyb
Copernicus, Einsetin, Galileo, Newton, and Aristotle? How did the differ in their ideas and contributions to physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hankeyb said:
Copernicus, Einsetin, Galileo, Newton, and Aristotle? How did the differ in their ideas and contributions to physics?

Is this a homework question?
 
This is far too broad a topic to address in a forum thread.
 
Is the answer - One of them was left-handed.
 
They were all born on different days?
 
They're just too different to mention their differences!
If it were only Galileo and Newton, there could be an answer.
 
yes indeed, the answers can vary because of the divergence in the question.
I am not sure about everyone, but:
1) Aristotle was the 1st to propose a "law" of mechanics, which was equivalent to what people used to see and understand in those days. That you act a force and the object moves, so the idea was something like F=a v with a a proportional constant and v the velocity.
The interesting part in that law is that it holds for motion in very thick liquids (for example the motion of a body in honey).
The thing with ancient "scientists" or better philosophers is that they didn't really use mathematics in the way they were later come in use. For example there was no differential equation formalism, and most of their ideas were based either on their philosophies or on their observations/phenomenolgy (I push the door,it opens- I push it stronger it opens faster)
 
I like ChrisVer's approach to answering the OP's question. Maybe we can state the basic differences between general principles used by scientists in different eras.
 
This is far too broad. Locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
680
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K