What Does a Broad Peak at 2θ = 20.92° Indicate in Polymer XRD Analysis?

AI Thread Summary
The XRD results indicate that the polymer specimen exhibits a broad peak, suggesting it is primarily amorphous. The addition of Al2O3 filler to the Chitosan + PEO + LiClO4 matrix leads to an increase in peak broadness while maintaining peak presence, implying a potential increase in amorphicity. The colored traces represent varying filler concentrations, with the intensity analysis showing that peak heights decrease as filler is added, likely due to scattering effects. Further analysis is needed to separate the contributions of the polymer and filler, including baseline intensity plots for clearer insights. Understanding these interactions is crucial for evaluating the crystallinity of the material.
SPEOTW
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Confusion about amorphous and crystalline region on XRD result
So i just have my XRD result (Polymer Specimen) which i use to determine crystallinity of my material, and it turns out that my material has no obvious peak, and have a broad peak which usually associated with amorphous material. I added some filler to my material and it became more and more broad but the peak stays there. does it mean my material become "more amorphous" or what does it mean
1690031515625.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What do the different coloured traces represent?
What was the filler you added to the polymer?

I agree, it does look like an amorphous material.
What was the isomer and catalyst?
Does it progressively crystallise over time?
 
Hii thanks for answering my question , my material was Chitosan + PEO + LiClO4 and i added Al2O3 in it, the black one represent 0% filler, red one is 3%, blue is 5%, and green is 7%.

So the trend i saw here is the peak became broader and broader, what does it correlates to the crystallinity of my material.
 
A quick evaluation in an image processing program indicates that the peaks are indentical in width but their amplitude above their baselines decreases as filler is added.

This would indicate that the filler is scattering the x-rays, thereby raising the baseline.

Measuring in "Intensity" units, starting with the Green trace at the top:
"Peak" heights above their local baseline;
80
110
130
160

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, Lord Jestocost and Baluncore
What is the source of the broad peak at 2θ = 20.92° ?

It appears that the traces are stacked on the intensity axis, with loss of the baseline references. That makes it difficult to separate out the effects of the polymer and the filler, which I suspect is part of what we are seeing.

To analyse this further, I would need to see the intensity plot baseline for the sample support without a sample, and the plot with 100% filler alone, without polymer.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and Tom.G
Hello! I've been brainstorming on how to prevent a lot of ferrofluid droplets that are in the same container. This is for an art idea that I have (I absolutely love it when science and art come together) where I want it to look like a murmuration of starlings. Here's a link of what they look like: How could I make this happen? The only way I can think of to achieve the desired effect is to have varying droplet sizes of ferrofluid suspended in a clear viscous liquid. Im hoping for the...
Hello everyone! I am curious to learn how laboratories handle in-house chip manufacturing using soft lithography for microfluidics research. In the lab where I worked, only the mask for lithography was made by an external company, whereas the mold and chip fabrication were carried out by us. The process of making PDMS chips required around 30 min–1 h of manual work between prepolymer casting, punching/cutting, and plasma bonding. However, the total time required to make them was around 4...
Back
Top