What Does the Atomic Model Look Like After the Quantum Revolution?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The atomic model post-quantum revolution illustrates that electrons exist in probability clouds rather than fixed orbits, characterized by standing wave functions. When atoms bond, their electron clouds interact, leading to superposition effects, although the exact nature of this interaction can be complex, especially with transition metals. Electrons can transition between atoms, resulting in overlapping wave functions that reflect their probabilistic nature. Additionally, all constituents of an atom are entangled and share a single wave function, reinforcing the concept of quantum entanglement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave functions.
  • Familiarity with atomic structure and electron behavior.
  • Knowledge of quantum entanglement and its implications.
  • Basic concepts of chemical bonding and electron cloud configurations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of wave function superposition in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the behavior of electrons in chemical bonding, particularly in transition metals.
  • Study quantum entanglement and its effects on atomic interactions.
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of standing wave functions in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, chemistry, and materials science, particularly those interested in quantum mechanics and atomic interactions.

pibomb
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a few questions concerning what the atomic model currently "looks like" since the quantum revolution.

I know that, since the wavefunction, electrons are in probability "clouds" and I know they are standing waves. So this would mean, technically speaking, that the electron is an element of matter, charge, and spin that is not equally "spread out" along its standing wave. So, when atoms bond, do these waves superimpose each other? Is the wavefunction changed when atoms bond? Also, is an electron still a complete standing wave even when it is not "orbiting" around a nucleus?

On entanglement, if an entire atom acts as one entity, then all of its consitutes are entangled and share a single wavefunction correct? If no, please explain.

Thanks to all those who respond
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well no an electron does not have an even probability distrubution if that's what youre asking. If you think back to the particle in a box idea, in order to make 'ends meet' ie make the function mathematically sound, it results in a function that is not flat but has a sineusodial motion.

In terms of bonding this is an overlap into chemsitry. If you look at the resulting electron cloud configurations from various bonds (it can get complicated when you get to or past transition metals and such) you can see that there is an interaction between the clouds, as to wether or not this is a simple superposition effect I am not sure but id imagine its a bit more complicated, but that's along the right lines of thinking, i think :P

-G
 
pibomb said:
So, when atoms bond, do these waves superimpose each other? Is the wavefunction changed when atoms bond?
As the atoms get closer together, electrons 'jump' from one atom to the other, and the same can be said of the opposite atom. This results in two waves, in opposite directions. In doing so, the waves superimpose on each other, which for jumping is similar to the electron being into different eigenstates at the same time, due to proability. All that can really be determined is that the probablility of finding the electrons in either of the atoms is 1. It is possible to restrict the radius and so the distance an electron can travel and so increase individual probabilities but that is about it.

I hope this helps, and is mostly right :biggrin:

The Bob (2004 ©)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K