What Does the Calculus Sentence Not Every Curve... Mean?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yaya10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of a sentence from a calculus book regarding the definition of curves and functions. Participants explore the criteria that determine whether a curve can be classified as a function, using examples such as circles and parabolas.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on a specific sentence about curves and functions.
  • Another participant explains that a curve must have a unique y value for each x value to be considered a function, using the example of a circle which fails this criterion.
  • It is noted that while the equation x² + y² = 1 (the circle) does not represent a function, the upper or lower half of the circle can be defined as a function.
  • Participants agree that y = x² is a function, while y² = x is not, due to similar reasoning regarding multiple y values for a single x value.
  • A further explanation of the definition of a function is provided, emphasizing the uniqueness of output for each input.
  • An analogy is made comparing the function definition to a reproducible experiment in science, highlighting the importance of consistent results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions and examples discussed, but there is no explicit consensus on the broader implications of these definitions or their applications beyond the examples provided.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of functions and curves are present, but these are not fully explored or resolved within the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in calculus, particularly those seeking to understand the definitions and distinctions between curves and functions.

yaya10
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone,

I was reading a calculus book and I have read this sentence that I could not understand.

Can someone please explain it to me.

Your help is highly appreciated.


I am referring to the one starts from (Not every curve ... the given circle).

Thanks a lot.
Yaya
 

Attachments

  • 1cal.jpg
    1cal.jpg
    28.5 KB · Views: 453
  • 2cal.jpg
    2cal.jpg
    38.8 KB · Views: 372
  • 3cal.jpg
    3cal.jpg
    21.9 KB · Views: 442
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not clear which part you are confused on.

But I'll try...

To define a curve as a function, we should be able, for each x value, to look along the vertical line at the x value, exactly one, and no more than one, value of y, to that x value. So at no x value, shall we look up and down the vertical line and find two or more y values. Notice that, for the circle, for x=0, we find two y values. Thus the circle cannot be defined as a function.

However, if we take the lower half, or the upper half, we can take just one of these halves, and we'll be able to describe it with a function.

Let us know if this does not clear things up, and precisely where you have a question.
 
Thanks algebrat,

so, basically not every curve is a function.

so we say that x^2+y^2=1 is not a function because if we put x=0, we will have to solutions of y. y=sqrt(1). ...(1)


we can aslo say that y=x^2 is a function

but y^2=x is not a function for the same reason as (1)

Is that correct?


Thanks again for your help
 
Yes, that is true. It all reduces to the definition of "function". The very simplest definition of "function" is "a set of ordered pairs such that no two distinct pairs have the same first member". That definition comes from the more primitive concept of a function where we start with some value, x (the "first member"), and produce a unique second value, y. I have always thought of this is being similar to the requirement in science that an experiment should be "reproducible"- that is, if do the same experiment repeatedly in exactly the same way (the x, or "first member"), we should get exact same results (the y, or second member). The definition is not "symmetric"- it is perfectly reasonable that doing an experiment in slightly different ways might give the same result. Another way of looking at it is that if you go into a store, you would find many different products at a variety of prices. It might well happen that very different products happen to have the same price. But if you found exactly the same product (same brand, same size, etc.) at different prices you would think that someone had made a mistake.
 
Now, I see I think that's makes a lot of sense.

Like a Cola machine If you put $1 and press one button you will get one thing if you do it again you would have the same result.

I thank you both HallsofIvy and algebrat for your help:)


:)

Yaya
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K