What Does Your Post and Like Count Say About You?

  • Thread starter Drakkith
  • Start date
  • #1
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
21,171
5,029
Post count. "Like" count. What are your best explanations about what they say about you (and other PF members)? This isn't serious, it's just a silly little game. Anything goes. I'll start:

Multiply your like count by 100 and then divide it by your post count. This is the number of lovers you've had.

##\frac{\log(Post Count)} {\log(Like Count)}## rounded to the nearest whole number = Number of times you'll win the lottery in your lifetime. (Only once for me :cry:)

##Post Count * e^{-6} =## chance that you've posted too much and should stop now. (I'm at 42.96%)
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
6,265
1,280
Anyone whose post count divided by their like count equals pi wins. Period.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibn Al Kishki, Evo, cnh1995 and 3 others
  • #3
Borek
Mentor
28,703
3,192
The results are skewed, old regulars have plenty of posts from times when there were no likes.
 
  • Like
Likes nrqed, Evo and fresh_42
  • #4
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
21,171
5,029
The results are skewed, old regulars have plenty of posts from times when there were no likes.

Yep.
 
  • Like
Likes Evo and fresh_42
  • #5
Borg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,892
2,485
Multiply your like count by 100 and then divide it by your post count. This is the number of lovers you've had.
60? That equation is definitely off. :oldtongue:
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, mister mishka, Evo and 2 others
  • #6
strangerep
Science Advisor
3,243
1,156
Heh, for guys at least, I'd suspect that ##(posts \times likes)## on PF has an inverse relationship to the number of girlfriends you've had. :cry:
 
  • Like
Likes Evo, Borek and Drakkith
  • #7
18,427
8,264
Heh, for guys at least, I'd suspect that ##(posts \times likes)## on PF has an inverse relationship to the number of girlfriends you've had. :cry:
PF is the only girlfriend you need. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Ibn Al Kishki, fresh_42 and Drakkith
  • #8
strangerep
Science Advisor
3,243
1,156
PF is the only girlfriend you need. :smile:
Ahem,... have you been interfering with your computer's ethernet port again?
 
  • Like
Likes Ibn Al Kishki, Evo, ProfuselyQuarky and 2 others
  • #9
DrGreg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,328
1,132
PF is the only girlfriend you need. :smile:
PF is my girlfriend? I'm going to have to erase my browser history.

Again.
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith, Evo and ProfuselyQuarky
  • #10
Fervent Freyja
Gold Member
654
696
Probably that I must be an unhelpful harlot on here. I really dislike my like count being displayed. Not that I don't appreciate getting likes, because I do. An assumption could be that I didn't earn my likes by being helpful and working hard on here, but could be attributed to something else.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibn Al Kishki, vela, dkotschessaa and 2 others
  • #11
14,873
12,386
Probably that I must be an unhelpful harlot on here. I really dislike my like count being displayed. Not that I don't appreciate getting likes, because I do. An assumption could be that I didn't earn my likes by being helpful and working hard on here, but could be attributed to something else.
... those eyes ...
 
  • Like
Likes Ibn Al Kishki, mister mishka, ProfuselyQuarky and 2 others
  • #12
60? That equation is definitely off. :oldtongue:

Yeah same, 60 is much lower than in reality.. :oldtongue:
 
  • Like
Likes Evo, Borg and Drakkith
  • #13
1,047
779
Probably that I must be an unhelpful harlot on here. I really dislike my like count being displayed. Not that I don't appreciate getting likes, because I do. An assumption could be that I didn't earn my likes by being helpful and working hard on here, but could be attributed to something else.

The bribe money? I haven't told any..oops
 
  • Like
Likes Fervent Freyja and Evo
  • #14
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,919
7,886
An assumption could be that I didn't earn my likes by being helpful and working hard on here, but could be attributed to something else.
Well, I can assure you that in my particular case it most definitely IS attributable to something else. The "likes" USED to be "thanks" which was a MUCH more meaningful thing but Greg insisted (over my vehement but useless protestations) on changing it to "like", I guess so we'd be more like Facebook.

So now we have a situation where, for example, @Drakkith , @PeterDonis , and I all have about the same number of "likes". BUT ... They have them because they are in fact very helpful and are constantly giving people (including me) useful information. I have them largely because people sometimes find my smart-ass remarks amusing. Their "likes" and mine just aren't counting the same thing at all and I knew that would happen when Greg changed "thanks" to "like".
 
  • Like
Likes Evo, dkotschessaa, Bystander and 1 other person
  • #15
jim mcnamara
Mentor
4,324
2,959
... Just gave a @phinds a like, for exactly the reason he cited. :-p A kind of recursive like, if you like.

For myself, when I post a joke in the general discussion thread on lame jokes I get way more likes for one post than I do for dozens of more serious posts that each take time to research and set up. Not sure what that means. ... Don't know what I'm doing? Lame jokes are of more benefit? So is Paul (phinds) correct, the function of a like is what the crowd dictates by usage, and not what the forums admin wants it to be?
 
  • Like
Likes Evo and Bystander
  • #16
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,919
7,886
... Just gave a @phinds a like, for exactly the reason he cited. :-p A kind of recursive like, if you like.

For myself, when I post a joke in the general discussion thread on lame jokes I get way more likes for one post than I do for dozens of more serious posts that each take time to research and set up. Not sure what that means. ... Don't know what I'm doing? Lame jokes are of more benefit?
So is Paul (phinds) correct, the function of a like is what the crowd dictates by usage, and not what the forums admin wants it to be?
But I think it IS what @Greg Bernhardt wants it to be ... a Facebook-like "like". We had this conversation back when he changed it from "thanks".
 
  • #17
1,047
779
Well, I can assure you that in my particular case it most definitely IS attributable to something else. The "likes" USED to be "thanks" which was a MUCH more meaningful thing but Greg insisted (over my vehement but useless protestations) on changing it to "like", I guess so we'd be more like Facebook.

So now we have a situation where, for example, @Drakkith , @PeterDonis , and I all have about the same number of "likes". BUT ... They have them because they are in fact very helpful and are constantly giving people (including me) useful information. I have them largely because people sometimes find my smart-ass remarks amusing. Their "likes" and mine just aren't counting the same thing at all and I knew that would happen when Greg changed "thanks" to "like".
I just liked your post out of spite. Take that!
 
  • #18
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,919
7,886
I just liked your post out of spite. Take that!
Yeah, that happens all the time :-p

You probably would not have done that if it had been a "thanks" button
 
  • Like
Likes Evo and dkotschessaa
  • #19
1,047
779
Yeah, that happens all the time :-p

You probably would not have done that if it had been a "thanks" button
I like likes. (Did it again! )

I don't have Facebook anymore, but I do think the idea of "likes" as well as +1s (on Google+) were a good idea.

I think the idea is that you want to acknowledge a post and it's content whether something further needs to be added or not.

It's a nod, an approving grunt, an "I get ya."

Get me?
 
  • #20
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,919
7,886
I
It's a nod, an approving grunt, an "I get ya."

Get me?
Yes, I get you, but my point is that this ISN'T Facebook, it's a serious science forum and I believe "thanks" means "thank you for the help" which is what I would like to see when appropriate vs "like" which means exactly what you said it means, nothing more.
 
  • Like
Likes Evo and nrqed
  • #21
6,265
1,280
Yes, I get you, but my point is that this ISN'T Facebook, it's a serious science forum and I believe "thanks" means "thank you for the help" which is what I would like to see when appropriate vs "like" which means exactly what you said it means, nothing more.
My take on the controversy was that a "thanks" ought to be explicitly expressed in a post addressing the person you're thanking. Seems like the least you could do if they spend some time and effort on your question. A "thanks" button trivializes this.

Also, when it used to be a "thanks" button, it was clear a large percentage of people were misusing it as a "like" button, having been primed by FaceBook to do so, a situation that further eroded its function as an expression of gratitude.

The problem from the start, it seemed to me, was that Greg had gotten the very idea of some kind of button from the FaceBook "like" button, and, that being the case, was having a hard time hijacking it for other purposes. You may claim this isn't FaceBook, but when you import a FaceBook device, you psychologically put people in a FaceBook kind of frame.
 
  • #22
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,919
7,886
My take on the controversy was that a "thanks" ought to be explicitly expressed in a post addressing the person you're thanking. Seems like the least you could do if they spend some time and effort on your question. A "thanks" button trivializes this.
I agree this was one of the best arguments Greg put forward for the change and I agree w/ your point of view.

Also, when it used to be a "thanks" button, it was clear a large percentage of people were misusing it as a "like" button, having been primed by FaceBook to do so, a situation that further eroded its function as an expression of gratitude.
I'm less confident about this but it certainly has the ring of truth / likelihood.

The problem from the start, it seemed to me, was that Greg had gotten the very idea of some kind of button from the FaceBook "like" button, and, that being the case, was having a hard time hijacking it for other purposes. You may claim this isn't FaceBook, but when you import a FaceBook device, you psychologically put people in a FaceBook kind of frame.
Yeah, but I'm curmudgeonly and don't WANT PF to be Facebook, thus my resistance to the change.
 
  • #23
6,265
1,280
Also, when it used to be a "thanks" button, it was clear a large percentage of people were misusing it as a "like" button, having been primed by FaceBook to do so, a situation that further eroded its function as an expression of gratitude.
I'm less confident about this but it certainly has the ring of truth / likelihood.
It's certainly a personal perception on my part, but what I perceived is that random people were "thanking" people without having ever posed any questions. The "thanks," therefore, seemed actually to mean, "Given that someone else, and not me, posed this question, I never-the-less "like" your answer."
Yeah, but I'm curmudgeonly and don't WANT PF to be Facebook, thus my resistance to the change.
Prior to any button a really large percentage of people were quoting posts they liked and commenting by means of emoticon alone. A whole separate post like that, as opposed to a mere "like" notice, causes untold trillions of electrical charges to be tied up in electronic chips each and every time someone does that, charges which might serve a much more useful purpose in some other capacity. There's only so much electrical charge in the universe and only a micro-minute fraction of that is available for our use here on earth. Let us deploy our limited supply conservatively.
 
  • #24
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,919
7,886
It's certainly a personal perception on my part, but what I perceived is that random people were "thanking" people without having ever posed any questions. The "thanks," therefore, seemed actually to mean, "Given that someone else, and not me, posed this question, I never-the-less "like" your answer."
At leas some of those were probably intended as "thanks for posting such a helpful answer" but I get your point.

Prior to any button a really large percentage of people were quoting posts they liked and commenting by means of emoticon alone. A whole separate post like that, as opposed to a mere "like" notice, causes untold trillions of electrical charges to be tied up in electronic chips each and every time someone does that, charges which might serve a much more useful purpose in some other capacity. There's only so much electrical charge in the universe and only a micro-minute fraction of that is available for our use here on earth. Let us deploy our limited supply conservatively.
:smile:
 
  • #25
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2020 Award
1,758
4,401
I believe "thanks" means "thank you for the help"
could be "Thanks or the Joke"!
 

Related Threads on What Does Your Post and Like Count Say About You?

Replies
52
Views
6K
T
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
559
Replies
52
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
50
Views
21K
  • Last Post
Replies
20
Views
8K
Top