B What ever happened to Classical Unified Field Theory?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rick16
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Theory
AI Thread Summary
Professional physicists continue to explore the unification of gravitational and electromagnetic fields, although the classical approach has faced significant skepticism. Some researchers believe that Einstein's nonsymmetric Unified Field Theory (UFT) lacks rigor, particularly criticizing his treatment of indices in differential geometry. The discussion reflects a broader debate on whether this quest is a viable scientific pursuit or a futile endeavor. Critics argue that the foundational concepts may not align with modern understandings of physics. Overall, the pursuit of a classical unified field theory remains contentious and unresolved in the scientific community.
Rick16
Messages
131
Reaction score
31
TL;DR Summary
What happened to unified field theory?
Are there currently professional physicists who work on Einstein’s quest to unify the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field (as classical fields), or has this idea been completely abandoned? Is it simply a hopeless endeavour?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're referring to Einstein's "nonsymmetric UFT", well,... imho it's total rubbish. His cavalier manipulations of the two lower indices on the connection components shows that he didn't really understand the true purpose of the connection object in the context of differential geometry. It's "indexology" (where I invent that term in analogy to "numerology"). :oldfrown:
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
I don't need cloth simulation. I need to simulate clothing meshes. Made of triangles and I need an answer that someone with High School math can understand. I am actually using the time it takes for someone to answer to create a model with less geometry than the one I have been using. I want clothing that can be removed on a model that will be animated. I don't need stretching or wrinkles on my meshes, I just need gravity. I have an idea of how I could do it, but I don't know how to apply...

Similar threads

Back
Top