Graduate What exactly is the string theory landscape?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that the "string landscape" in string theory refers to a mathematical parameter space rather than physical space. It illustrates this with an example of a pendulum's parameter space, emphasizing that while the parameter space for string theory is complex, it defines the combinations of parameters that could correspond to different universes. Each combination represents a unique universe that interacts solely within itself, with the traditional Big Bang model suggesting only one universe exists, while modern theories like eternal inflation propose an infinite number of universes, each corresponding to a point in the string landscape.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of string theory fundamentals
  • Familiarity with Calabi-Yau manifolds
  • Knowledge of parameter spaces in physics
  • Concepts of Big Bang and eternal inflation theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical framework of Calabi-Yau manifolds
  • Study the implications of eternal inflation on cosmology
  • Explore the concept of parameter spaces in advanced physics
  • Investigate the relationship between string theory and the multiverse hypothesis
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and students of theoretical physics seeking to deepen their understanding of string theory and its implications for the nature of the universe.

ad infinitum
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
Do the the different calabi-yau space solutions of strings theory exist is isolated space-times or are they a part of a continuous whole with space folding and unfolding as you move though space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The phrase "string landscape" does not refer to physical space, which is what you seem to be implying, but instead refers to a mathematical parameter space. A very simple example of a parameter space would be if you drew a graph for the bob of a pendulum where the x-axis was position, and the y-axis was momentum. It would be an ellipse which shows what are the allowed combinations of those two variables with physically realizable. The parameter space for string theory is vastly more complicated but it shows what combinations of the many parameters are possible, and we are trying to find a specific point that matches the real Universe.
 
jeffery_winkler said:
The phrase "string landscape" does not refer to physical space, which is what you seem to be implying, but instead refers to a mathematical parameter space. A very simple example of a parameter space would be if you drew a graph for the bob of a pendulum where the x-axis was position, and the y-axis was momentum. It would be an ellipse which shows what are the allowed combinations of those two variables with physically realizable. The parameter space for string theory is vastly more complicated but it shows what combinations of the many parameters are possible, and we are trying to find a specific point that matches the real Universe.
So then for any combination of parameters there is a complete specific universe that interacts only with itself and not with a domain of even a marginal variation of parameters. That is, these parameters including the precise folding of a single Calabi-Yau extend unaltered through all of space and time.
 
In the traditional Big Bang model, it was assumed that there is only one universe, so only one of these points in the string landscape, which you could think of as allowed universes, would be physically realized. The others would be just allowed values of the parameters. In a parameter space, the points represent allowed values even if they are not physically realized. In more modern theories, such as eternal inflation, there could be an infinite number of universes, so each of these points in the landscape would be physically realized somewhere. They would not be casually connected. The details of the topology that the extra dimensions are compactified on would vary throughout.
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K