What force is stronger, Gravity or Magnetism?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of gravitational and magnetic forces, particularly in the context of black holes (BHs) and their event horizons. Participants explore theoretical implications, observational phenomena, and the nature of forces in extreme environments, including the behavior of matter near black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that while magnetism is generally stronger on Earth, the dynamics change near the event horizon of a supermassive black hole, where gravitational potential may be weaker.
  • Others argue that the electromagnetic force holding elements together could be stronger in certain conditions, particularly around smaller black holes emitting significant Hawking radiation.
  • A later reply questions the role of magnetism in the jets emitted by black holes, suggesting that these jets originate from matter outside the event horizon and involve complex physical processes, including magnetohydrodynamics (MHD).
  • There is uncertainty regarding whether black holes can separate magnetic poles within particles and whether black holes themselves could exhibit polar characteristics.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the existence of magnetic monopoles and their potential relevance near black holes, noting that such concepts remain speculative.
  • One participant raises questions about the fate of matter falling into a black hole and its relation to light, indicating a desire for clarification on these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the strength of gravitational versus magnetic forces near black holes, with multiple competing views and uncertainties remaining throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of forces, the complexity of physical processes involved in black hole accretion, and unresolved questions regarding the nature of magnetic fields in extreme gravitational environments.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring astrophysics, particularly the behavior of forces in extreme environments, as well as individuals curious about black hole physics and related theoretical concepts.

JBash
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
What force is stronger, Gravity or Magnetism?

I know that magnetism in general is stronger here on Earth but what about by the event horizon of a super massive black hole?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, JBash! What do you think? Small magnets lift objects off tables so the logical conclusion is magnetism is more powerful than gravity on earth. At the event horizon of a black hole . . . hard to say. I would guess the black hole has no intrinsic magnetic properties, however the inspiraling particles could acquire enormous magnetism.
 
Last edited:
JBash said:
What force is stronger, Gravity or Magnetism?

I know that magnetism in general is stronger here on Earth but what about by the event horizon of a super massive black hole?
Since the gravity potential is much smaller at the EH of a massive BH than it is around a smaller BH, it would be magnetism, if you mean the electromagnetic force holding elements together. The smaller the BH, the stronger the gravity at the EH, and a particularly small BH that is small enough to be emitting big-time Hawking radiation is where gravity would probably overwhelm the EM force.

Someone can probably compute at what size/mass for the BH this "swap" would take place, but it ain't me..:cry:

EDIT: If you mean the electromagnetic field around the BH (all BH's have an EM field) then it is very weak so in almost all cases the gravity would be stronger than the EM field.
 
Last edited:
Thank you both for your kind responses...

This leads me to another question?

When BH's "feed" sometimes they will shoot (jet) matter outward- in opposite the direction (where I have learn almost as fast as the speed of light) does this have anything to do with Magnetism?

While a BH's gravity pull is obviously very strong, is it strong enough to separate magnetic poles within particles and if so, would BH be polar?
 
JBash said:
This leads me to another question?

When BH's "feed" sometimes they will shoot (jet) matter outward- in opposite the direction (where I have learn almost as fast as the speed of light) does this have anything to do with Magnetism?
There's a mish-mash of misunderstanding here.

It's not the BH which 'shoots matter outward', that comes from the matter that's well outside the BH's event horizon.

When stuff (matter, other than dark matter) starts to 'go down the BH drain', a great deal of it ends up in an accretion disk (Google on this term), due to a combination of very well known and well understood physical processes.

What happens in such accretion disks is a topic of great interest to astrophysicists, and there are many who are actively working on this.

One approach is to combine plasma physics (specifically, MHD) with gravitational theory (Newtonian will do, but GR is better), to see what happens. One object of this work is to create models which accurately reproduce what astronomers observe - polar jets.

In these models, magnetic fields do play an important role ... after all, what does the 'M' in 'MHD' stand for?
While a BH's gravity pull is obviously very strong, is it strong enough to separate magnetic poles within particles and if so, would BH be polar?
I'm not sure I follow your question here ... however, magnetic monopoles have not been detected, either in the lab or in astronomical observations.

Such critters do appear in various theories, that go beyond the Standard Model of particle physics.

Whether there are certain regimes near the event horizons of (relatively) low-mass BHs which can produce the kinds of magnetic monopoles of the various theories that predict them, well, I myself don't know.

But even if there is such a prediction, I'd say it'll be a couple of decades (at least) before there's enough observational and experimental results to move such ideas from speculation to a more firm basis.
 
Last edited:
Nereid puts it well, as usual. The jets observed from AGN, and black holes, originate far from anything you could characterize as the 'event horizon'. Matter gets smoking hot via collisions as it inspirals long before it reaches the gravitational seed.
 
what is the rotation direction af a BH?
i have a question that if a matter fall into a BH what will happen to it?
will it be transformed into light?
can some body explain to me the relation between the light-coin thery with the BH.
will BH can be a SWAPHOLE that can go through the time theologically?
thanks!
i don't know much about physics but i ask depend on my common sense.
please don't laugh if i ask wrong.
thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
9K