What Form Did Matter and Antimatter Take During Annihilation After the Big Bang?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deepak247
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang
AI Thread Summary
After the Big Bang, matter and antimatter were created in equal amounts, but most annihilated, leaving a small fraction of matter. The discussion focuses on the forms of matter and antimatter involved in annihilation, particularly whether baryons or mesons predominated. It clarifies that significant annihilation occurred between baryons, specifically protons and neutrons, after the QCD phase transition. The initial asymmetry that favored matter over antimatter was established during baryogenesis, prior to baryon formation. Overall, the annihilation process was crucial in shaping the matter content of the universe.
Deepak247
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Ive heard that soon after the big bang matter and antimatter was created in equal proportions and that majority of the matter-antimatter annihilated among each other, somehow only a small fraction of matter remained... my question is...

what was the form of the matter or antimatter which was annihilated?

was it mostly in baryons or mesons? i.e. mostly baryons annihilating among each other or mesons annihilating among each other?

what was the ratio?
 
Space news on Phys.org
positrons with electrons; quarks with antiquarks
 
ok but how much was proton-antiproton and neutron-antineutron annihilation there?

i mean to say baryon annihilation...was it significant?
 
As I said, there was annihilation between quarks and antiquarks -- not baryons. The initial asymmetry between quarks, q, and antiquarks, \bar{q} was in fact not significant:
\frac{n_q - n_{\bar{q}}}{n_q} \simeq 10^{-8}
 
Yes, that is correct. Sorry, I was mistaken. The initial asymmetry was setup during baryogenesis, prior to baryon formation; the annihilations occurred between baryons after the QCD phase transition.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top